Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T05:19:09.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A quasi-trapezoid inequality for double integrals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

N. S. Barnett ,
S. S. Dragomir  and
C. E. M. Pearce
N. S. Barnett
Affiliation:
School of Communications and Informatics, Victoria University of Technology, PO Box 14428, Melbourne City MC, VIC 8001, Australia. E-mail address: {neil, sever}@matilda.vu.edu.au
S. S. Dragomir
Affiliation:
School of Communications and Informatics, Victoria University of Technology, PO Box 14428, Melbourne City MC, VIC 8001, Australia. E-mail address: {neil, sever}@matilda.vu.edu.au
C. E. M. Pearce
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia. E-mail address: cpearce@maths.adelaide.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

A quasi-trapezoid inequality is derived for double integrals that strengthens considerably existing results. A consonant version of the Grüss inequality is also derived. Applications are made to cubature formulæ and the error variance of a stationary variogram.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , January 2003 , pp. 355 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2003

References

[1]Barnett, N. S. and Dragomir, S. S., “An Ostrowski type inequality for double integrals and applications to cubature formulae”, Soochow J. Math., to appear.Google Scholar
[2]Barnett, N. S. and Dragomir, S. S., “A note on bounds for the estimation error variance of a continuous stream with stationary variogram”, J. KSIAM 2 (1998) 49–56.Google Scholar
[3]Barnett, N. S., Gomm, I. S. and Armour, L., “Location of the optimal sampling point for the quality assessment of continuous streams”, Austral. J. Stat. 37 (1995) 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Mitrinović, D. S., Pečarić, J. E. and Fink, A. M., Classical and new inequalities in analysis (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Mitrinović, D. S., Pečarić, J. E. and Fink, A. M., Inequalities for functions and their integrals and derivatives (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994).Google Scholar
[6]Rathod, H. T. and Govinda Rao, H. S., “Integration of trivariate polynomials over linear polyhedra in Euclidean three-dimensional space”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 39 (1998) 355–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Saunder, I. W., Robinson, G. K., Lwin, T. and Holmes, R. J., “A simplified variogram method for the estimation error variance in sampling from continuous stream”, Internat. J. Mineral Processing 25 (1989) 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Sloan, I. H., “Multiple integration is intractable but not hopeless”, ANZIAM J. 42 (2000) 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar