Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T08:36:50.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface cues and the development of given/new interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Shu-Hui Eileen Chen
Shu-Hui Eileen Chen*
Affiliation:
National Taipei Teachers College
*
Department of Language and Literature Education, National Taipei Teachers College, 134, Ho-ping East Road, Section 2, Taipei, Taiwan 106, Republic of China. Email: shuchen@ms7.hinet.net
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As children develop language, they also acquire strategies to utilize surface forms to interpret the meaning and functions of sentences. This study investigated how Chinese-speaking children (aged 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13) and adults utilize structural and prosodic cues to interpret the pragmatic function of given and new information intrasententially. The results revealed that: (a) children did not utilize word order cues effectively in NVN sentences with normal stress; (b) children utilized the marked grammatical structure of passives and pseudoclefts more effectively than clefts; (c) when stress converged or competed with word order or syntactic structures, children responded nonuniformly; and (d) animacy was a factor that affected children's interpretation of given versus new. Interaction effects are discussed in light of the Competition Model.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , October 1998, pp. 553 - 582
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E., Dale, P. S., & Thai, D. (1995). Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In &, P. FletcherMacWhinney, B. (Eds.), The handbook of child language (pp. 96–151). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In &, E. WannerGleitman, L. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The slate of the art (pp. 173–219). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–73). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F., & Venza, V. (1984). A crosslinguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 55, 341–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, J. K. (1977). The effect of a pragmatic presupposition on syntactic structure in question answering. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 723–734.Google Scholar
Bock, J. K., & Mazzella, J. R. (1983). Intonational marking of given and new information: Some consequences for comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 11, 64–76.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1977). Integrating process in comprehension. In &, D. LabergeSamuels, S. J. (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 217–241). Hillsdale, NJ: L Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Li, C. (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 27–55). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, R. (1983). Focus devices in Mandarin Chinese. In Tang, T., Cheng, R., & Li, Y. (Eds.), Hanyu jufa yuuixue lunji [Studies in Chinese syntax and semantics, universe and scope: Presupposition and quantification in Chinese] (pp. 50–102). Taipei: Student Book Company.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the given/new contract. In Freedle, R. O. (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1–40). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., & Swinney, D. (1987). Prosody and the development of comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 14, 145–167.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In &, E. BachHarms, R. (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1992). Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A., & Housum, J. (1987). Talkers’ signaling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, P. M., & Smith, J. (1976). The structure of communication in early language development. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 199–244.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P. M., & Smith, J. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Herring, S. C. (1990). Information structure as a consequence of word order type [Proceedings of the sixteenth annual meeting]. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 16, 163–174.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. (1987). The pragmatics of reference in child language: Some issues in developmental theory. In Hickmann, M. (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought (pp. 165–184). Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M., & Liang, J. (1990). Clause-structure variation in Chinese narrative discourse: A developmental analysis. Linguistics, 28, 1167–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homby, P. A. (1971). Surface structure and the topic-comment distinction: A developmental study. Child Development, 42, 1975–1988.Google Scholar
Homby, P. A. (1973). Intonation and syntactic structure in the development of presupposition.Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of Society of Research in Child Development,Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Homby, P. A. (1974). Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13. 538–550.Google Scholar
Hornby, P. A., Hass, W. A., & Feldman, C. F. (1970). A developmental analysis of the “psychological” subject and predicate of the sentence. Language and Speech, 13, 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S., & Chui, K. (1997). Is Chinese a pragmatic order language? In Tseng, Chiu-yu (Ed.), Zhongguo jingnei yuyenji yuyenxue (pp. 51–79). Taipei: Academia Sinica, Institute of History and Philology.Google Scholar
Kail, M., & Hickmann, M. (1992). French children's ability to introduce referents in narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language, 12, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). Some fundamental aspects of language development after age 5. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (pp. 455–474). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1987). Function and process in comparing language and cognition. In Hickmann, M. (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought (pp. 185–202). Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: Afunctional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1977). Starting points. Language, S3, 152–168.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1978). Sentential devices for conveying givenness and newness: A cross-cultural developmental study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 539–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Price, D. (1980). The development of the comprehension of topic-comment marking. In Ingram, D., Peng, C. C., & Dale, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Congress for the Study of Child Language (pp. 121–144). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Miao, X.-C. (1981). Word order and semantic strategies in Chinese sentence comprehension. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 8, 23–33.Google Scholar
Most, R., & Saltz, E. (1979). Information structure in sentences: New information. Language and Speech, 22, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, R. (1985). The emergence of pragmatic comprehension: A study of children's understanding of sentence-structure cues to given/new information. Journal of Child Language, 12, 161–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, A. M. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prince, E. (1978). A comparison of wh-clefts and if-clefts in discourse. Language, 54, 883–904.Google Scholar
Prince, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In Cole, P. (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 223–255). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Prince, E. (1985). Fancy syntax and “shared knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 65–81.Google Scholar
Schefté, H. (1953). A method forjudging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biomelrika, 40, 87–104.Google Scholar
Shen, X.-N. (1990). The prosody of Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1982). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 128–170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1991). Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1, 7–25.Google Scholar
Sun, C.-F., & GivcSn, T. (1985). On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language, 61, 329–351.Google Scholar
Teng, S.H. (1979). Remarks on cleft sentences in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 7, 1011–1015.Google Scholar
Tsao, F.-F. (1979). Afunctional study of topic in Chinese: The first step towards discourse analysis. Taipei: Student Book Company.Google Scholar
Wieman, L. A. (1976). Stress patterns of early child language. Journal of Child Language, 3, 283–286.Google Scholar