Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T14:17:29.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acquisition and generalization of Japanese locatives by English-speakers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Marcia Weber-Olsen  and
Kenneth F. Ruder
Marcia Weber-Olsen
Affiliation:
Central Michigan University
Kenneth F. Ruder*
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
*
Kenneth F. Ruder,Bureau of Child Research, 1043 Indiana St., Lawrence, KS 66044
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

American 5-year-olds and adults learned to label various spatial relationships using four Japanese locatives that coincided or partially overlapped in meaning with the locative prepositions into, onto, out of, and off.

Subjects' generalization of the Japanese words was pre- and post-tested to determine if locatives that were semantically (and to a small extent phonemically) similar to their English equivalents would yield better transfer than terms that deviated in meaning and phonemic structure from English. Results confirmed for children only that generalization was differentially affected following lexical training. Adults generalized all four Japanese words with equal accuracy and showed significantly better transfer than children on all but one locative.

Lexical interference initially accounted for many adult and child substitution errors, but did not explain child errors on the post-test. Findings did not agree with predictions that semanticphonemic differences between English and Japanese locatives would adversely affect transfer of the Japanese lexicon to novel exemplars of these terms. Results did confirm, however, that adults learned the Japanese lexicon faster and better than the 5-year-olds.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , May 1980 , pp. 183 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Berko, J.The child's learning of English morphology. Word. 1958, 14, 150–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.A first language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.What do we learn when we learn a language? TESOL Quarterly, 1970, 4, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromer, R. F.The learning of surface structure clues to deep structure clues by a puppet show technique. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 24, 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromer, R. F.Child and adult learning of surface structure cues to deep structure using a picture card technique. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1974, 5, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K.Errors and strategies in child second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly. 1974, 8, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L.The Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised edition. Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Services, 1959.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. M. Structure and process in language acquisition. In Ervin-Tripp, S. (Ed.), Language acquisition and communicative choice. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. M.Is second language learning like the first? TESOL Quarterly, 1974, 8, 11–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K.Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning. 1974, 24, 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E.Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B.Second-language learning in children. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscowitz, A. B. On the status of vowel shift in English. In Moore, T. E. (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Politzer, R., & Weiss, L.Developmental aspects of auditory discrimination, echo response and recall. The Modern Language Journal, 1969, 53, 75–85.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M.Age differences in the pronunciation of foreign sounds. Language and Speech, 1977, 20, 357–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, C. E., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M.The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 1978, 49, 1114–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, H. H.Perspectives on second-language teaching. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1970.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. P.Toward a theory of language acquisition. Language Learning, 1974, 24, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, B. P.The use of overgeneralization and transfer learning strategies by elementary and intermediate students of ESL. Language Learning, 1975, 25, 73–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar