Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T13:31:18.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Auditory comprehension and aging: Decline in syntactic processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Loraine K. Obler ,
Deborah Fein ,
Marjorie Nicholas  and
Martin L. Albert
Loraine K. Obler*
Affiliation:
City University of New York Graduate School, Emerson College
Deborah Fein
Affiliation:
Boston University School of Medicine
Marjorie Nicholas
Affiliation:
Boston University School of Medicine
Martin L. Albert
Affiliation:
Boston University School of Medicine
*
Loraine K. Obler, The Graduate School & University Center of CUNY, PhD Program in Speech & Hearing Sciences, 33 West 42nd Street, Box 365, New York, NY 10036-8099
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Comprehension of six syntactic structures was tested across four age groups. Each structure was presented with both plausible and implausible content. The contribution of cognitive nonlinguistic factors important for comprehension (attention, short-term memory, and mental control) was tested via standard neuropsychological tasks. Sixty-six women aged 30–79 were tested. Both errors and reaction times increased with age, especially for more complex syntactic types and implausible sentences. The neuropsychological factors tested contributed minimally to an age-related decline in comprehension, suggesting that the subtle breakdown seen in syntactic processing may be a language-specific impairment.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 433 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Baddeley, A. D., & Kitch, G. B. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and activation (vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Bayles, K. A., & Kaszniak, A. W. (1987). Communication and cognition in normal aging and dementia. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Belmore, S. M. (1981). Age-related changes in processing explicit and implicit language. Journal of Gerontology, 36(3), 316–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, G. (1979). Language comprehension in old age. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 412–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, G. A., & Ball, H. (1989). Effects of age on comprehension of complex sentences in adulthood. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delis, D., Kramer, J., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. (1983). The California Verbal Learning Test.Google Scholar
Emery, O. (1985). Language and aging. Experimental Aging Research Monograph, 11(1).Google ScholarPubMed
Emery, O. (1986). Linguistic decrement in normal aging. Language and Communication, 6, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feier, C. D., & Gerstman, L. J. (1980). Sentence comprehension abilities throughout the adult life span. Journal of Gerontology, 35(5), 722–728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalikow, D. N., Stevens, K. N., & Elliott, L. L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 61, 1337–1351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemper, S. (1986). Imitation of complex syntactic constructions by elderly adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoefel, J., & Albert, M. L. (in press). Neurologic and neurobehavioral changes with normal aging. In Lamour, Y. (Ed.), Brain changes with aging. Paris: Encyclopedie Diderot, Masson.Google Scholar
Lezak, M. (1981). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Menn, L., & Obler, L. K. (1989). Cross-language data and theories of agrammatism. In Mann, L. & Obler, L. K. (Eds.), Agrammatic aphasia: A cross-language narrative source-book (pp. 1369–1389). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obler, L., & Albert, M. L. (1984, October). Language and aging. Paper Presented at the Academy of Aphasia, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Obler, L. K., Nicholas, M., Albert, M. L., & Woodward, S. (1985). On comprehension across the adult lifespan. Cortex, 21, 273–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosvold, H. E., Mirsky, A. F., Sarason, I., Bransome, E. D. Jr., & Beck, L. H. (1956). A CPT of 8 damages. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 20, 343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupp, R. R. (1980). Speech input processing, hearing loss, and aural rehabilitation with the elderly. In Obier, L. K. & Albert, M. L. (Eds.), Language and communication in the elderly: Clinical and therapeutic approaches (pp. 159–180). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Schmitt, J. F., & McCroskey, R. L. (1981). Sentence comprehension in elderly listeners: The factor of rate. Journal of Gerontology, 36(4), 441–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shankweiler, D., & Crane, S. (1986). Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach. Cognition, 24, 139–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroop, J. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar