Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-7drmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T03:22:33.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interhemispheric learning and speed of hemispheric transmission in dyslexic and normal readers: A replication of previous results and additional findings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Frank R. Vellutino ,
Donna M. Scanlon  and
William L. Bentley
Frank R. Vellutino*
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Albany
Donna M. Scanlon
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Albany
William L. Bentley
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Albany
*
Dr. Frank R. Vellutino, Child Research and Study Center, State University of New York at Albany, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12222
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two studies evaluated the interhemispheric transmission deficit explanation of reading disability comparing second- and sixth-grade poor and normal readers on learning and discrimination tasks that involved hemifield presentations of visual stimuli. In the first of these studies, in the main poor readers performed below the level of normal readers on paired associates learning, regardless of the visual field in which the stimulus appeared, thereby replicating previous findings. In the second study, no differences between reader groups were found on time taken to indicate presence or absence of a simple dot stimulus. It was concluded from the combined results that deficiency in inter-hemispheric transmission is not a significant cause of reading disability.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 209 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, T. W.An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
Annett, M. Handedness. In Beaumont, J. G. (Ed.), Divided visual field studies of cerebral organisation. New York: Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Beaumont, J. G. Studies with verbal stimuli. In Beaumont, J. G. (Ed.), Divided visual field studies of cerebral organisation. New York: Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Bryant, N. D.Diagnostic test of phonic skills. Published by the author, 1963.Google Scholar
Davidoff, J. Studies with non-verbal stimuli. In Beaumont, J. G. (Ed.), Divided visual field studies of cerebral organisation. New York: Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R.Naming of pictured objects by dyslexic and other learning disabled children. Brain and Language, 1976a, 39, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R.Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.); Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 1976b, 14, 471–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filbey, R. A., & Gazzaniga, M. S.Splitting the normal brain with reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 1969, 17, (6), 335–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, M. A. A transformational analysis of the oral language structure used by two reading groups at the second grade level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1967.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S.The bisected brain. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S., Bogen, J. E., & Sperry, R. W.Observations on visual perception after disconnection of the cerebral hemisphere in man. Brain, 1965, 88, 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, N. The anatomy of acquired disorders of reading. In Money, J. (Ed.), Reading disability: Progress and research needs in dyslexia. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Geschwind, N. Neurological foundations of language. In Myklebust, H. R. (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1968.Google Scholar
Geschwind, N., & Fusillo, M.Color-naming defects in association with alexia. AMA Archives of Neurology, 1966, 15, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilmore, J. V.Gilmore oral reading test. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. R.Reading skill and the minimum distance principle: A comparison of listening and reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1976, 22, 123–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorm, A. F.Parietal lobe function in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 1977, 15, 841–844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirk, R. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1968.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. Speech, the alphabet and teaching to read. In Resnick, L. & Weaver, P. (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1979.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hogaboam, T.The relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975, 67, 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. M. Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Poritsky, S., & Stotsky, R.American children with reading problems can easily learn to read English represented by Chinese characters. Science, 1971, 171, 1264–1267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudel, R. C.Learning disability - Diagnosis by exclusion and discrepancy. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1980, 19, 547–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sattler, J. M.Assessment of children's intelligence. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1974.Google Scholar
Schulte, C. A study of the relationship between oral language and reading achievement in second-graders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1967.Google Scholar
Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, I. Y. Exploring the relations between reading and speech. In Knights, R. M. & Bakker, D. J. (Eds.), Neuropsychology of learning disorders: Theoretical approaches. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Slosson, R. L.Slosson intelligence test. East Aurora, N.Y.: Slosson Educational Publications, 1963.Google Scholar
Sperry, R. W.The great cerebral commissure. Scientific American, 1964, 210, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vellutino, F. R.Alternative conceptualizations of dyslexia: Evidence in support of a verbal deficit hypothesis. Harvard Educational Review, 1977, 47, (3), 334–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellutino, F. R.Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., Bentley, W. L., & Phillips, F.Inter- versus intra-hemispheric learning in dyslexic and normal readers. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1978, 20, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vellutino, F. R., Harding, C. J., Phillips, F., & Steger, J. A.Differential transfer in poor and normal readers. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1975, 126, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. The effect of phonemic segmentation training and response acquisition on coding ability in poor and normal readers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 1979.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. Free recall of concrete and abstract words in poor and normal readers. Paper presented at the conference of Cognitive Processes in Reading, sponsored by the British Psychological Society, Exeter, England, March 1980.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Tanzman, M. Effects of category cuing at time of presentation and retrieval on memory performance in poor and normal readers. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., Smith, H., Steger, J. A., & Kaman, M.Reading disability: Age differences and the perceptual deficit hypothesis. Child Development, 1975, 46, (2), 487–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vellutino, F. R., Steger, J. A., Harding, C. J., & Phillips, F.Verbal vs. non-verbal paired-associates learning in poor and normal readers. Neuropsychologia, 1975, 13, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vellutino, F. R., Steger, J. A., & Kandel, G.Reading disability: An investigation of the perceptual deficit hypothesis. Cortex, 1972, 8, 106–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D.Wechsler intelligence scale for children-revised. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1974.Google Scholar
Wiig, E. H., Semel, M. S., & Crouse, M. B.The use of English morphology by high-risk and learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1973, 6, (7), 457–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittrock, M. C. Education and the cognitive processes of the brain. In Chall, J. S. & Mirsky, A. F. (Eds.), Education and the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. The word-retrieval process and reading in children and aphasics. In Nelson, K. (Ed.), Children's language, Volume III. New York: Gardner Press, in press.Google Scholar
Young, A. W. Methodological and theoretical bases of visual hemifield studies. In Beaumont, J. G. (Ed.), Divided visual field studies of cerebral organisation. New York: Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar