Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-qr5l4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T20:26:37.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning disabled children's comprehension and production of syntactic devices for marking given versus new information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Mavis Donahue
Mavis Donahue*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
*
Mavis Donahue, College of Education, Box 4348, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60680
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined learning disabled children's ability to understand and use syntactic devices for marking given versus new information in discourse, a skill where syntactic and pragmatic knowledge intersect. Using a modification of Hornby's (1971) paradigm, learning disabled and nondisabled children in grades 1 through 6 selected pictures on the basis of varying sentence types, such that their choices revealed their identification of the given information in each sentence. The production of syntactic structures for marking new elements in sentences was also assessed. Multivariate analyses revealed grade and sex effects on the comprehension task, but the only effect involving group status indicated that learning disabled girls were less able to comprehend cleft sentences than the other children. On the production task, learning disabled children relied on less complex sentence types; however, their strategies for marking given versus new information were as effective as those of nondisabled children. Implications of these findings for the relations between syntactic repertoire and the ability to integrate given and new information in oral and written discourse are discussed.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , August 1984 , pp. 101 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E. (1976). Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bedrosian, J., & Prutting, C. (1978). Communicative performance of mentally retarded adults in four conversational settings. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 79–95.Google Scholar
Blalock, J. (1982). Persistent auditory language deficits in adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 604–609.Google Scholar
Bryan, T. (1977). Children's comprehension of non-verbal communication. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 501–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, T., Donahue, M., & Pearl, R. (1981). Learning disabled children's peer interactions during a small group problem solving task. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 13–22.Google Scholar
Bryan, T., Donahue, M., Pearl, R., & Sturm, C. (1981). Learning disabled children's conversational skills: The “TV Talk Show.” Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 250–259.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. (1981). Deficient syntactic control in poor readers: Is a weak phonetic memory code responsible? Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 201–212.Google Scholar
Caro, D., & Schneider, P. (1982). Creating referents in text: A comparison of learning disabled and normal adolescents' texts. Proceedings of the University of Wisconsin Symposium for Research in Child Language Disorders, 1982, 3, 123–133.Google Scholar
Chomsky, C. (1972). Stages in language development and reading exposure. Harvard Educational Review, 42, 1–33.Google Scholar
Clark, H., & Clark, E. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Denckla, M., & Rudel, R. (1976). Naming of object drawings by dyslexic and other learning disabled children. Brain and Language, 3, 1–16.Google Scholar
Donahue, M. (1981). Requesting strategies of learning disabled children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, M. (in press). Linguistic and communicative development in learning disabled children. In Ceci, S. (Ed.) Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
Donahue, M., & Bryan, T. (1983). Conversational skills and modeling in learning disabled boys. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, M., Pearl, R., & Bryan, T. (1980). Learning disabled children's conversational competence: Responses to inadequate messages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 387–403.Google Scholar
Donahue, M., Pearl, R., (1982). Learning disabled children's syntactic proficiency on a communicative task. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 22–28.Google Scholar
Donahue, M., & Prescott B. (1983). Young learning disabled children's conversational participation in dispute episodes with peers. Chicago Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M. (1965). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Feagans, L., & Short, E. (in press). Developmental differences in the comprehension and production of narratives by reading disabled and normally achieving children. Child Development.Google Scholar
Fey, M., Leonard, L., & Wilcox, K. (1981). Speech style modifications of language disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamica, O. (1977). Some prosodic and paralinguistic features of speech to young children. In Snow, C. & Ferguson, C. (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition, pp. 63–88. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenfield, P., & Zukow, P. (1978). Why do children say what they say when they say it?: An experimental approach to the psychogenesis of presupposition. In Nelson, K. (Ed.), Children's language, Vol. 1, pp. 287–336. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Hornby, P. (1971). Surface structure and the topic-comment distinction: A developmental study. Child Development, 42, 1975–1988.Google Scholar
Hornby, P. (1973). Intonation and syntactic structure in the development of presupposition. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Idol-Maestas, L. (1980). Oral language responses of children with reading difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 14, 385–404.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (in press). Point sharing. In Schiefelbusch, R. & Pickar, J. (Eds.), Development of communicative competence. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1978). Sentential devices for conveying givenness and newness: A cross-cultural developmental study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 539–558.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Price, D. (1980). The development of the comprehension of topic-comment marking. In D. Ingram, F. Peng, & P. Dale (Eds.), Proceedings of the First international Congress for the Study of Child Language, 1, 121–144.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. (1974). Preschool children's use of definite and indefinite articles. Child Development, 45, 446–455.Google Scholar
McCall, R., & Applebaum, M. (1973). Bias in the analysis of repeated-measures designs: Some alternative approaches. Child Development, 44, 401–405.Google Scholar
Moran, M., & Byrne, M. (1977). Mastery of verb tense markers by normal and learning disabled children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 529–542.Google Scholar
Myers, F., & Myers, R. (1983). Perception of stress contrasts in semantic and non-semantic contexts by children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naslund, R., Thorpe, L., & Lefever, D. (1978). SRA Achievement Series Test. Chicago: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
Noel, M. M. (1980). Referential communication abilities of learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 70–75.Google Scholar
Paul, R. (1981). Children's understanding of surface structure cues to given-new information in sentences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Pearl, R., Donahue, M., & Bryan, T. (1981). Learning disabled children's responses to nonexplicit requests for clarification. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 53, 919–925.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (1982). Learning the rules of the game: Four views of the relation between social interaction and syntax acquisition. In Deutsch, W. (Ed.), The child's construction of language. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shatz, M., & Gelman, R. (1973). The development of communication skills: Modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38, #5, 1–36.Google Scholar
Skarakis, E., & Greenfield, P. (1982). The role of new and old information in the verbal expression of language-disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 462–467.Google Scholar
Spekman, N. J. (1981). Dyadic verbal communication abilities of learning disabled and normally achieving fourth and fifth-grade boys. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 139–151.Google Scholar
U.S. Office of Education. (1977). Assistance to states for education of handicapped children: Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities. Federal Register, 42, 65082–65085.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. (1975). Syntactic abilities in normal and dyslexic children. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Wieman, L. (1976). Stress patterns of early child language. Journal of Child Language, 3, 283–286.Google Scholar
Wiig, E., Florence, D., Kutner, S., & Sherman, B. (1977). Perception and interpretation of explicit negations by learning-disabled children and adolescents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 1251–1257.Google Scholar
Wiig, E. H., & Semel, E. M. (1976). Language disabilities in children and adolescents. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
Wiig, E. H., & Semel, E. M. (1980). Language assessment and intervention for the learning disabled. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. (1981). The word retrieval process and reading in children and aphasics. In Nelson, K. (Ed.), Children's language (vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R., & Johnson, M. (1977). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery. Boston: Teaching Resources Corp.Google Scholar