Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:18:51.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III. Anglo-Saxon Button Brooches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

Richard Avent and
Vera I. Evison
Get access

Abstract

The term button brooch has been used to describe a variety of different types of small circular Anglo-Saxon brooches. In the past, these have been generally dated to the period beginning in the late fifth century and continuing through to the middle of the sixth. In this paper the term will have a rather more restricted use and apply only to those small saucer-shaped brooches whose main area of ornament consists of a representation of the human face and any other brooches which seem to be derived from this main type. One hundred and eighteen brooches fit into this definition although it has only been possible to examine personally one hundred and six of these. One brooch from Mucking (22.5) was cast in silver before being gilded, otherwise all the brooches were cast in bronze, presumably in a two-piece mould and, with one or two exceptions, were then gilded. The hinge-lug and catchplate were cast in one with the rest of the brooch and the majority of surviving pins indicate that these were made of iron, although six bronze examples have also survived. With the exception of one brooch, the catch section of the catchplate was always bent over in the same direction; to the right if the brooch is placed facedown and turned so that the catch is at the top and the hinge-lug at the bottom. The exception is a brooch from Collingbourne Ducis (11.1) where the turn is to the left.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Archaeologia , Volume 107 , 1982, pp. 77 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Åberg, N., 1926. The Anglo-Saxons in England. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Åberg, N., 1953. Den Historiska Relationen mellan Folkvandringstid och Vendeltid. Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademiens Handlingar, 82. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Akerman, J. Y., 1847. An Archaeological Index. London.Google Scholar
Akerman, J. Y., 1853. ‘An account of excavations in an Anglo-Saxon burial ground at Harnham Hill, near Salisbury’, Archaeologia, xxxv, 259–78.Google Scholar
Akerman, J. Y., 1855. Remains of Pagan Saxondom. London.Google Scholar
Akerman, J. Y., 1857. ‘Report of researches in a cemetery of the Anglo- Saxon period at Brighthampton, co. Oxford’, Archaeologia, xxxvii, 391–8.Google Scholar
Akerman, J. Y., 1857–1859. ‘Note on some further discoveries of Anglo-Saxon remains at Broughton Poggs, Oxon.’, Proc. Soc. Antiq. iv, 73–4.Google Scholar
Akerman, J. Y., 1860. ‘Second report of researches in a cemetery of the Anglo-Saxon period at Brighthampton, Oxon.’, Archaeologia, xxxviii, 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerman, J. Y., 1860. ‘Report on researches in an Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Long Wittenham, Berkshire, in 1859’, Archaeologia, xxxviii, 327–52.Google Scholar
Alcock, L., 1968. ‘Excavations at South Cadbury Castle, 1967’, Antiq. J. xlviii, 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, L., 1971. Arthur's Britain, London.Google Scholar
Alcock, L., 1972. ‘By South Cadbury is that Camelot…’, The Excavation of Cadbury Castle 1966–70. London.Google Scholar
Aldsworth, F., 1978. ‘The Droxford Anglo-Saxon cemetery, Soberton, Hampshire’, Proc. Hants Field Club, xxxv, 93–182.Google Scholar
Anon, , 1886–1895. ‘Appendix. Archaeological notes’, Trans. Newbury Dist. Fid. Club, iv, 198.Google Scholar
Arwidsson, G., 1977. Die Gräberfunde von Valsgärde: III (Valsgärde 7). Uppsala.Google Scholar
Avent, R., 1975. Anglo-Saxon Garnet Inlaid Disc and Composite Brooches: Part i. Brit. Archaeol. Rep., 11. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bakka, E., 1958. ‘On the beginning of Salin's Style I in England’, Universitet i Bergen Årbok Historisk-Antikvarisk rekke, 3.Google Scholar
Boon, G. C, 1959. ‘The latest objects from Silchester, Hants’, Medieval Archaeology, iii, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulanger, M. C, 1909. Le cimetière franco-mérovingien et carolingien de Marchélepot (Somme). Paris.Google Scholar
Brent, J., 1867. ‘An account of researches in an Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Stowting, in Kent, during the Autumn of 1866’, Archaeologia, xli, 409–20.Google Scholar
Brown, D., 1978. Anglo-Saxon England. London.Google Scholar
Brown, G. B., 1915. The Arts in Early England: Vol. III, Saxon Art and Industry in the Pagan Period. London.Google Scholar
Bruce-Mitford, R., 1975. Recent Archaeological Excavations in Europe. London.Google Scholar
Crépin, A., 1957. Le cimetière de Preures. Mémoires de la Commission Départmentale des Monuments Historiques du Pas-de-Calais, viii. Arras.Google Scholar
Cunnington, W., 1896. Catalogue of Antiquities in the Museum of the Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, revised by Goddard, E. H. Devizes.Google Scholar
Dale, W., 1902. ‘… the discovery of an Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Droxford, Hants’, Proc. Soc. Antiq. Ser. 2, xix, 125–9.Google Scholar
De Baye, J., 1892. Le Cimetière Wisigothique d'Herpes. Angoulême.Google Scholar
De Boüard, M., 1978. ‘Circonscription de Basse Normandie’, Gallia, xxxvi, 315–23.Google Scholar
Delamain, T., 1892. Le Cimetière d'Herpes. Angoulême.Google Scholar
Dennett, J., 1845. ‘Notes of discoveries which have been made in the barrows, &c. In the Isle of Wight, in the Year 1816, and at several subsequent periods’, Trans. Brit. Archaeol. Ass., Winchester (London), 151–5.Google Scholar
Douglas, J., 1793. Nenia Britannica. London.Google Scholar
Erä-Esko, A., 1965. Germanic Animal Art of Salin's Style I in Finland. Suomen Muinaismuistoyhdistyksen Aikakauskirja Finska Fornminnesföreningens Tidskrift, 63. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Evison, V. I., 1965. The Fifth-Century Invasions South of the Thames. London.Google Scholar
Evison, V. I., 1973. ‘Anglo-Saxon grave-goods from Mucking, Essex’, Antiq. J. liii, 269–70.Google Scholar
Evison, V. I., 1977. ‘Supporting-arm brooches and equal-arm brooches in England’, Studien zur Sachsenforschung (ed. H.-J., Hässler), 127–47. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Evison, V. I., 1978. ‘Early Anglo-Saxon applied disc brooches. Part I: on the Continent, Part II: In England’, Antiq. J. lviii, 88–102, 260–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evison, V. I., 1981. ‘Distribution maps and England in the first two phases’, Angles, Saxons and Jutes (ed. Evison, V. I.), 126–167. Oxford.Google Scholar
Genrich, A., 1951. ‘Über Schmuckgegenstände der Völkerwanderungszeit im nordöstlichen Niedersachsen’, Neues Archiv für Niedersachsen, xxiii, 251–81.Google Scholar
Gingell, C. J., 1975/1976. ‘The excavation of an early Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Collingbourne Ducis’, Wiltshire Arch. Mag. lxx/lxxi, 61–98.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Faussett, T. G., 1876. ‘The Saxon cemetery at Bifrons’, Arch. Cantiana, x, 298–315.Google Scholar
Griffith, A. F., 1925. ‘Some notes on Anglo-Saxon antiquities from High Down, near Worthing’, Sussex Arch. Coll., lxvi, 219–24.Google Scholar
Griffith, A. F. and Salzmann, L. F., 1914. ‘An Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Alfriston, Sussex’, Sussex Arch. Coll. lvi, 16–53.Google Scholar
Haseloff, G., 1974. ‘Salin's Style I’, Medieval Archaeology, xviii, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haseloff, G., 1978. ‘Das Fibelfragment aus Idstedt, Kreis Schleswig’, Offa, xxxv, 144–56.Google Scholar
Hawkes, S. C. and Dunning, G. C., 1961. ‘Soldiers and settlers in Britain, fourth to fifth century’, Medieval Archaeology, v, 1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillier, G., 1855. The History and Antiquities of the Isle of Wight. London.Google Scholar
Hoare, R. C., 1812. The Ancient History of South Wiltshire. London.Google Scholar
Holmqvist, W., 1972. ‘Die schwedischen Goldhalskragen’, Studia Gotica Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademiens Handlingar Antikvariska serien, 25, 234–53.Google Scholar
Holmqvist, W., 1980. Guld Halskragarna. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hougen, B., 1967. The Migration Style of Ornament in Norway. Oslo.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. E., 1854. ‘Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Harnham’, Wilts. Arch. Mag. i, 196–208.Google Scholar
Jessup, R., 1950. Anglo-Saxon Jewellery. London.Google Scholar
Jones, M. U., 1972. ‘The Mucking, Essex, crop-mark sites’, Essex Journal, vii, 65–76.Google Scholar
Laing, L. and Laing, J., 1979. Anglo-Saxon England. London.Google Scholar
Leeds, E. T., 1912. ‘The distribution of the Anglo-Saxon saucer brooch in relation to the Battle of Bedford, A.D. 571’, Archaeologia, lxiii, 159–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, E. T., 1913. The Archaeology of the Anglo-Saxon Settlements. Oxford.Google Scholar
Leeds, E. T., 1936. Early Anglo-Saxon Art and Archaeology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Leeds, E. T., 1945. ‘The distribution of the Angles and Saxons archaeologically considered’, Archaeologia, xci, 1–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, E. T. and Harden, D. B., 1936. The Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Abingdon, Berkshire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Leeds, E. T. and Shortt, H. de S., 1953. An Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Petersfinger, near Salisbury, Wilts. Salisbury.Google Scholar
Limelette, A., 1863–1864. ‘Cimetière franc de Spontin’, Annales de la Société archéologique de Namur, viii, 327–68.Google Scholar
Mackeprang, M. B., 1952. De Nordiske Guldbrakteater. Jysk Archaeologisk Selskabs Skrifter ii. Aarhus.Google Scholar
Myres, J. N. L., 1954. ‘Two Saxon urns from Ickwell Bury, Beds., and the Saxon penetration of the Eastern Midlands’, Antiq. J. xxxiv, 201–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myres, J. N. L. and Green, B., 1973. The Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries of Caistor-by-Norwich and Markshall, Norfolk. Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London, xxx. London.Google Scholar
Passmore, A. D., 1934. ‘Saxon button brooch from Silchester’, Proc. Hants Field Club, xii, 212.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. J., 1855.‘On the antiquities of the Isle of Wight’, J.B.A.A. xi, 177–93.Google Scholar
Pilet, C., 1975. ‘La nécropole de Frénouville’, La Normandie Souterraine. Rouen.Google Scholar
Pilet, C., 1978. ‘Le mobilier Anglo-Saxon de la nécropole de Frénouville’, Centenaire de I'Abbé Cochet-1975. Actes du Collogue International d'Archéologie. Rouen, 441–63.Google Scholar
Roeder, F., 1933. ‘Neue Funde auf Kontinental-Sachsischen Friedhofen der Völkerwanderungszeit’, Anglia, lvii, 322–60.Google Scholar
Rupp, H., 1937. Die Herkunft der Zelleneinlage und die Almandin-Scheibenfibeln im Rheinland. Rheinische Forschungen zur Vorgeschichte: Band II. Bonn.Google Scholar
Rygh, O., 1885. Norske Oldsager I. Christiana.Google Scholar
Scuvée, F., 1973. Le cimetière barbare de Réville (Manche), VIe et VIIe siècles, Fouilles 1959–1966. Caen.Google Scholar
Seiluer, Cl., 1976. ‘Une nécropole de l'époque des invasions’, Archéologia, 90 (January), 37–43.Google Scholar
Seiluer, Cl., 1978. ‘Caractère et évolution de la nécropole de Vron (Somme) IVème-VIIème siècles’, Revue du Nord, lx, 873–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seillier, Cl. and Gosselin, J.-Y., 1975. ‘Trois épingles de coiffure mérovingiennes de Vron (Somme)’, Septentrion, v, 61–7.Google Scholar
Smith, R. A., 1900. ‘Anglo-Saxon Remains’, The Victoria History of the Counties of England: A History of Hampshire and the Isle of Wight: Vol. I, pp. 373–98. London.Google Scholar
Smith, R. A., 1908. ‘Anglo-Saxon Remains’, The Victoria History of the Counties of England: A History of Kent: Vol. I, pp. 339–87. London.Google Scholar
Smith, R. A., 1902. ‘Anglo-Saxon Remains’, The Victoria History of the Counties of England: A History of the County of Northampton: Vol. I, pp. 223–56, London.Google Scholar
Smith, R. A., 1935–1936. ‘Jutish finds in Kent’, Brit. Mus. Quart, x, 131–2.Google Scholar
Tester, P. J., 1968. ‘An Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Orpington’, Arch. Cantiana, lxxxiii, 125–50.Google Scholar
Thomas, S., 1967. ‘Die germanischen Scheibenfibeln des römischen Kaiserzeit im freien Germanien’, Berliner Jahrbuch für Vor- und Frühgeschichte, vii, 1–187.Google Scholar
Van es, W. A. and Ypey, J., 1977. ‘Das Grab des “Prinzessin” von Zweeloo und seine Bedeutung im Rahmen des Gräberfeldes’, Studien zur Sachsenforschung (ed. H.-J., Hässler), pp. 97–126. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Verron, G. and Pilet, C., 1977. ‘Un nouveau témoin de la présence anglo-saxonne en Basse-Normandie à l'époque mérovingienne: la fibule cupelliforme de Vierville (Manche)’, Archéologie mediévale, vii, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vierck, H., 1978. ‘Trachtenkunde und Trachtgeschichte in der Sachsen-Forschung, ihre Quellen, Ziele und Methoden’, Sachsen und Angelsachsen (ed. C., Ahrens), pp. 231–43, Veroffentlichungen des Helms-Museums, 32, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Vierck, H., 1978. ‘Die anglische Frauentracht’, Sachsen und Angelsachsen (ed. C., Ahrens), pp. 245–53, Veröffentlichungen des Helms-Museums, 32. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Warhurst, A., 1955. ‘The Jutish cemetery at Lyminge’, Arch. Cantiana, lxix, 1–40.Google Scholar
Webster, L. E., 1973. ‘Medieval Britain in 1972’, Medieval Archaeology, xvii, 138–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, J., 1941. Die Beiden Zierscheiben des Thorsberger Moorfundes. Römisch-Germanische Forschungen: Band 16. Berlin.Google Scholar
Werner, J., 1961. Katalog der Sammlung Diergardt (Völkerwanderungs zeitlicher Schmuck): Band I, Die Fibeln. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. M., 1968. ‘Medieval Britain in 1967’, Medieval Archaeology, xii, 155–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar