^{page 121 note 1} Victoria County History of Hants and the Isle of Wight, i, 271–84.

^{page 122 note 1} O.S. 1/2,500. Berkshire, sheet xliv, 12, Hampshire, sheet iv, 12 and sheet iv, 16, 1911 edition.

^{page 122 note 2} The Pottery found at Silchester, a descriptive account of the pottery recovered during the excavations on the site of the Romano-British city of Calleva Atrebatum at Silchester, Hants, and deposited in the Reading Museum, Thomas May, F.S.A. (Scot.), 1916.

^{page 122 note 3} V.C.H. Hants and the Isle of Wight, i, 271 ff.

^{page 123 note 1} Archaeologia, lxi (1909), facing p. 486Google Scholar.

^{page 125 note 1} Archaeologia, xc (1944), fig. 12, nos. 30–3, and p. 105Google Scholar.

^{page 125 note 2} ‘Excavations on the Iron Age Hill-fort of Oldbury, near Ightham, Kent’, J. B. Ward Perkins, F.S.A., Ibid., p. 129.

^{page 125 note 3} Ibid., lviii (1902), 24.

^{page 126 note 1} Information from Miss K. M. Kenyon (publication forthcoming).

^{page 127 note 1} Archaeologia, liii (1893), 561Google Scholar, shows one from Insula IV, near the Forum.

^{page 127 note 2} Ibid., lix (1905), 341, fig. 2.

^{page 129 note 1} Proc. Soc. Ant. xxiii (2nd series), p. 119Google Scholar.

^{page 130 note 1} Archaeologia, lxxx (1930), 229Google Scholarff

^{page 130 note 2} Ibid., lxi (1909), facing p. 486.

^{page 130 note 3} Now preserved in the Reading Museum.

^{page 130 note 4} This refers to his sketch and not only could its details be traced but three of these stakes were found in the filled-in trench.

^{page 132 note 1} Archaeologia, lxii (1910), 335Google Scholar.

^{page 135 note 1} Archaeologia, lxi (1909), facing p. 486Google Scholar.

^{page 137 note 1} Agricola, xxi, 68–73.

^{page 137 note 2} Archaeologia, Ixii (1910), 330Google Scholar.

^{page 140 note 1} From information kindly supplied by Prof. C. F. C. Hawkes.

^{page 140 note 2} V.C.H. Hants and the Isle of Wight, i, 271 ff.

^{page 140 note 3} ‘The Belgae of Gaul and Britain’, Arch. Journ. lxxxvii (1931), 291 ffGoogle Scholar.

^{page 141 note 1} Archaeologia (1944), xc, 7–8Google Scholar.

^{page 147 note 1} B.M.C. = British Museum Catalogue, Imperial Coins.

^{page 147 note 2} M. and S. = Mattingly and Sydenham, Royal Imperial Coinage.

^{page 148 note 1} Cohen = Monnaies frappés sous Vempire romain, 2nd edition.

^{page 150 note 1} Oswald, and Pryce, , An Introduction to the Study of Terra Sigillata (1920)Google Scholar.

^{page 152 note 1} All Silchester references are to‘The Pottery found at Silchester’, May (1916)Google Scholar. References to the unpublished pottery from Colchester are due to the courtesy of Mr. M. R. Hull, and I am much indebted to him for his help and suggestions.

^{page 152 note 2} From information kindly supplied by Prof. C. F. C. Hawkes, on the dating of this type at Colchester.

^{page 154 note 1} Mr. A. W. G. Lowther states that these ‘offset’ bowls, and the domed or fluted types as no. 19 occur so plentifully in Flavian levels at Ewell that he regards them as a typical Surrey type. At Silchester although these two examples were found in Period I levels, they are much commoner during Period II, and occur occasionally even in the early second-century levels.

^{page 156 note 1} Mr. C. F. C. Hawkes has drawn up a chart analysing the Terra Sigillata at Camulodunum (Soc. Ant. Research Report, no. xiv, fig. 41, p. 175) which shows that, at different periods, the maximum density of sigillata of each period is only reached after a ‘time-lag’ from the date of its manufacture.

^{page 160 note 1} Trans. C. and W. A. A. Soc. xiii, n.s. (1922)Google Scholar.

^{page 165 note 1} Arch. Ael. viii (3rd ser.).