Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T20:06:45.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Construction of Meanings in Museums

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Elizabeth Crooke
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The museum is a construct; the collections and the physical building are enclosed by a structure, invisible to the eye, which is created by the context in which the museum is being viewed. The nature of that structure will depend on the viewer; he or she will make his or her own meanings. Reinhard Bernbeck, in his paper The exhibition of architecture and the architecture of an exhibition, has investigated how the Pergamon Museum can simultaneously mean different things to different people, according to their cultural perspective. What is at the core of this is the political and social nature of museums, and one of the most dominant aspects of this is the demonstration of power. This determines how the museum collects, interprets and displays both the objects and itself, and is related to both Bernbeck's colonial and postmodern readings of the museum, as well has his discussion of ‘pragmatist’ and ‘purist’ approaches to museums in general. Though his paper is based on a case study of the Pergamon Museum in Berlin, the issues he raised are applicable to museums elsewhere. In this response to his paper, I am going to look at what this demonstration of power reflects about what museums mean and how they function and relate Bernbeck's evaluation to museum development I am most familiar with, that in Ireland.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , December 2000, pp. 130 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agger, B., 1992: The discourse of domination. From the Frankfurt school to postmodernism, Evanston.Google Scholar
Anderson, P., 1998: The origins of postmodernity, London.Google Scholar
Andrae, W., 1934: Die neuen Säle für altorientalische Kunst im Vorderasiatischen Museum, Berliner Museen. Berichte aus den Preussischen Kunstsammlungen 55(31), 46–56.Google Scholar
Andrae, E.W. and Boehmer, R.M., 1992: Walter Andrae, 18.2.1875 – 28.7.1956, in Andrae, E.W. and Boehmer, R.M. (eds), Bilder eines Ausgräbers. Sketches by an excavator. Walter Andrae im Orient 1898 – 1919, Berlin, 109–148.Google Scholar
Apel, K.-O., 1995: Anderssein, ein Menschenrecht? Über die Vereinbarkeit universaler Normen mit kultureller und ethnischer Vielfalt, in Hoffmann, H. and Kramer, D. (eds), Anderssein, ein Menschenrecht, Weinheim, 9–20.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. and Breckenridge, C.A., 1992: Museums are good to think: heritage on view in India, in Karp, I., Kreamer, C.M. and Lavine, S.D. (eds), Museums and communities. The politics of public culture, Washington D.C., 34–55.Google Scholar
Arnold, B. and Hassmann, H., 1995: Archaeology in Nazi Germany: the legacy of the Faustian bargain, in Kohl, P.L. and Fawcett, C. (eds), Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology, Cambridge, 70–81.Google Scholar
Babich, B.E., 1994: On malls, museums, and the art world: postmodernism and the vicissitudes of consumer culture, Art criticism 9(1), 93–109.Google Scholar
Bal, M., 1992: Telling, showing, showing off, Critical inquiry 18, 556–594.Google Scholar
Barringer, T., 1998: The South Kensington Museum and the colonial project, in Barringer, T. and Flynn, T. (eds), Colonialism and the object. Empire, material culture and the museum, London, 11–27.Google Scholar
Barthes, R., 1977: Image/music/text, London.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, J., 1983: Simulations, New York.Google Scholar
Beard, M. and Henderson, J., 1994: ‘Please don't touch the ceiling’. The culture of appropriation, in Pearce, S. (ed.), Museums and the appropriation of culture, London, 5–42.Google Scholar
Becker, P. von, 2000: ‘Leitkultur’, ‘Fremde’, ‘Zuwanderer’: wenn die Politik Phantasmen spinnt, Tagesspiegel November 11, 2000.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W., 1968: The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction, in Arendt, H. (ed.), Illuminations. Essays and reflections, New York, 217–252.Google Scholar
Bernau, N., 2000: Kein Pop auf der Insel. Die Ergebnisse des Wettbewerbs für das Pergamonmuseum, Berliner Zeitung 26.5.2000.Google Scholar
Bernau, N., n.d.: Das Pergamonmuseum in Berlin. Der Gründungsbau des wilhelminischen Neuklassizimus in der Debatte um Nationalstil und Nationalmuseum. Dissertation in progress, Technische Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Bernbeck, R. and Lamprichs, R., 1992: Museen, Besitz und Macht: wohin mit den Altertümern?, Das Altertum 38(2), 109–124.Google Scholar
Best, S. and Kellner, D., 1991: Postmodern theory: critical interrogations, New York.Google Scholar
Bhatt, C., 2000: Primordial being. Enlightenment, Schopenhauer and the Indian subject in postcolonial theory, Radical philosophy 100, 28–41.Google Scholar
Blattberg, R.C. and Broderick, C.J., 1991: Marketing of art museums, in Feldstein, M. (ed.), The economics of art museums, Chicago, 327–346.Google Scholar
Bode, W. von, 1997: Mein Leben (edited by Gaehtgens, T.W. and Paul, B.), Berlin.Google Scholar
Boswell, D. and Evans, J.(eds), 1999: Representing the nation: a reader. Histories, heritage and museums, London.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1984: Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste, Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. and Darbel, A., 1990: The love of art. European art museums and their public, Stanford.Google Scholar
Brands, G., 1990: Zwischen Island und Athen. Griechische Kunst im Spiegel des Nationalsozialismus, in Brock, B. and Preiß, A. (eds), Kunst auf Befehl? Dreiunddreiβig bis Fünfundvierzig, München, 103–136.Google Scholar
Brecht, B., 1971: Über Realismus, Frankfurt am Main (first edition 1939).Google Scholar
Buhr, M. and Kosing, A., 1974: Kleines Wörterbuch der marxistisch-leninistischen Philosophie, Berlin.Google Scholar
Bunch, L.G., 1995: Fighting the good fight. Museums in an age of uncertainty, Museum news March/April 1995, 32–35; 58–61.Google Scholar
Butler, E.M., 1958: The tyranny of Greece over Germany, Boston.Google Scholar
Caspar, H. and Krähe, H., 1995: Museumsinsel – ein ernster Pflegefall, Berliner Zeitung 12.5.1995.Google Scholar
Clifford, J., 1985: Objects and selves – an afterword, in Stocking, G.W., Objects and others. Essays on museums and material culture, Madison, 236–246.Google Scholar
Cohn, B.S., 1996: Colonialism and its forms of knowledge. The British in India, Princeton.Google Scholar
Corrin, L.G. (ed.), 1994: Mining the museum: an installation, New York.Google Scholar
Crooke, E.M., 2000: Politics, archaeology and the creation of the National Museum in Ireland. An expression of national life, Dublin.Google Scholar
Crüsemann, N., 2000: Vom Zweistromland zum Kupfergraben. Vorgeschichte und Entstehungsjahre (1899–1918) der Vorderasiatischen Abteilung der Berliner Museen vor fach- und kulturpolitischen Hintergründen, Berlin.Google Scholar
Daniels, S. and Cosgrove, D., 1988: Introduction: iconography and landscape, in Cosgrove, D. and Daniels, S. (eds), The iconography of landscape, Cambridge, 1–10.Google Scholar
Davies, M. and Vergo, P., 1989: Musing anew. Interview with Peter Vergo, Museums journal 89, 20–22.Google Scholar
Davis, W.M., 1979: Plato on Egyptian art, Journal of Egyptian archaeology 65, 121–127.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., 1983: Margins of philosophy, London.Google Scholar
Duncan, C., 1991: Art museums and the ritual of citizenship, in Karp, I. and Lavine, S.D. (eds), Exhibiting cultures. The poetics and politics of museum display, Washington, 88–103.Google Scholar
Duncan, C., 1995: Civilizing rituals. Inside public art museums, London.Google Scholar
Durrans, B., 1988: The future of the other: changing cultures on display in ethnographic museums, in Lumley, R. (ed.), The museum time machine, London, 144–169.Google Scholar
Eco, U., 1986: Travels in hyperreality, San Diego.Google Scholar
Elsner, J., 1996: The ‘New Museology’ and Classical art, American journal of archaeology 100, 769–773.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, T., 1997: Plugging culture, The nation September 8/15, 27–29.Google Scholar
Ernst, W., 1988: Entstellung der Historie? Museale Spuren(t)sicherung zwischen déja vu und Wahrnehmungsschock, in Rüsen, J., Ernst, W. and Grüttner, H.T. (eds), Geschichte sehen. Beiträge zur Ästhetik historischer Museen, Pfaffenweiler, 21–34.Google Scholar
Ernst, W., 1992/1993: Museale Räume im nachliberalistischen Zeitalter: Nationalsozialismus, Klassizismus, Antike(n), Hephaistos 11/12, 187–205.Google Scholar
Evans, H.C. and Wixon, W.D. (eds), 1997: The glory of Byzantium. Art and culture of the Middle Byzantine era, AD 843–1261. Catalog of the exhibition, New York.Google Scholar
Fehr, M., 1988: Aufklärung oder Verklärung, in Rüsen, J., Ernst, W. and Grüttner, H.T. (eds), Geschichte sehen. Beiträge zur Ästhetik historischer Museen, Pfaffenweiler, 110–123.Google Scholar
Fischer, F., 1961: Griff nach der Weltmacht. Die Kriegszielpolitik des Kaiserlichen Deutschland 1914 – 1918, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., 1966: Les mots et les choses, Paris.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., 1974: The archaeology of knowledge, London.Google Scholar
Gable, E. and Handler, R., 1996: After authenticity at an American heritage site, American anthropologist 98, 568–596.Google Scholar
Gaehtgens, T.W., 1992: Die Berliner Museumsinsel im Deutschen Kaiserreich, München.Google Scholar
Gaehtgens, T.W., 1996: The museum island in Berlin, in Wright, G. (ed.), The formation of national collections of art and archaeology, Washington D.C., 53–77Google Scholar
Gaillemin, J.-L. and Gaehtgens, T.W., 1997: Les musées de Berlin, Connaissance des arts 535, 96–109.Google Scholar
George, A.S., Hayward, J., Quinn, S., Rice, D., Sims, J.E. and Spock, M., 1990: Context and commitment. A round table discussion, Museum news September/October, 66–70.Google Scholar
Glasmeier, M., 1992: Vorwort, in Glasmeier, M. (ed.), Periphere Museen in Berlin, Berlin, 7–12.Google Scholar
Gordon, J., 1996: Museum fiction, Art history 19, 150–155.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, P., 1989: Education, entertainment and politics: lessons from the great international exhibitions, in Vergo, P. (ed.), The new museology, London, 74–98.Google Scholar
Haraway, D., 1984: Teddy Bear patriarchy: taxidermy in the garden of Eden, New York City, 1908–1936, Social text 11, 19–64. (Revised version in Haraway, D., Primate visions, 1989, London, 26–58).Google Scholar
Harris, N., 1990: Polling for opinions, Museum news September/October, 46–53.Google Scholar
Harvey, D., 1989: The condition of postmodernity, Cambridge (Mass).Google Scholar
Heilmeyer, W.-D., 1997: Aufstellungsgeschichte im 20. Jahrhundert. Die Aufstellungen von 1901, 1930 und 1959, in Heilmeyer, W.-D. (ed.), Der Pergamonaltar. Die neue Präsentation nach Restaurierung des Telephosfrieses, Berlin, 17–23.Google Scholar
Hein, G.E., 1998: Learning in the museum, London.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E., 1964: The age of revolution, 1789–1848, New York.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E., 1992: Nations and nationalism since 1780. Program, myth, reality, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hoepfner, W., 1997: Modell des Pergamonaltars im Maßstab 1:20, in Heilmeyer, W.D. (ed.) Der Pergamonaltar. Die neue Präsentation nach Restaurierung des Telephosfrieses, Berlin, 171–176.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, D., 1988: Künstler und Wissenschaftler als Produzenten kulturhistorischer Ausstellungen? in Rüsen, J., Ernst, W. and Grüttner, H.T. (eds), Geschichte sehen. Beiträge zur Ästhetik historischer Museen, Pfaffenweiler, 137–144.Google Scholar
Holtorf, C., 1995: ‘Problem oriented’ and ‘object oriented’ approaches to archaeological research – reconsidered, Hephaistos 13, 7–18.Google Scholar
Hooper-Greenhill, E., 1988: Counting visitors or visitors who count? in Lumley, R. (ed.), The museum time machine. Putting cultures on display, London, 213–232.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T.W., 1969: Dialektik der Aufklärung, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
Hudson, K., 1998: The museum refuses to stand still, Museum international 197, 43–50.Google Scholar
Jakob-Rost, L., Klengel-Brandt, E., Marzahn, J. and Wartke, R.-B., 1990: Vorderasiatisches Museum, Antike Welt 1990, special issue, 40–69.Google Scholar
Jakob-Rost, L., Klengel-Brandt, E., Marzahn, J. and Wartke, R.-B., 1992: Das Vorderasiatische Museum Berlin, Mainz.Google Scholar
Jameson, F., 1991: Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism, London.Google Scholar
Jencks, C., 1997: The contemporary museum, Architectural design 67, 9–13.Google Scholar
Jordanova, L., 1989: Objects of knowledge: A historical perspective on museums, in Vergo, P. (ed.), The new museology, London, 22–40.Google Scholar
Kästner, U., 1997: Ausgrabung und Zusammensetzung, in Heilmeyer, W.-D. (ed.), Der Pergamonaltar. Die neue Präsentation nach Restaurierung des Telephosfrieses, Berlin, 9–16.Google Scholar
Karp, I., 1992: On civil society and social identity, in Karp, I., Kreamer, C.M. and Lavine, S.D. (eds), Museums and communities. The politics of public culture, Washington D.C., 19–33.Google Scholar
Karp, I., Kreamer, C.M. and Lavine, S.D. (eds), 1992: Museums and communities. The politics of public culture, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Kearney, R., 1988: The wake of imagination, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
King, M.J., 1990: Theme park thesis, Museum news September/October, 60–62.Google Scholar
Klemm, G., 1963 [1843]: Fantasie über ein Museum für die Kulturgeschichte der Menschheit, in Schmitz, C.A. (ed.), Kultur, Frankfurt a.M., 5–16.Google Scholar
Koldewey, R., 1990: Das wiedererstehende Babylon, new enlarged edition, Hrouda, B., München.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I., 1986: The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process, in Appadurai, A. (ed.), The social life of things. Commodities in cultural perspective, Cambridge, 64–91.Google Scholar
Koshar, R., 2000: From monuments to traces. Artifacts of German memory, 1870–1990, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kunze, M., 1990: Antikensammlung, Antike Welt 1990, special issue, 70–105.Google Scholar
Kunze, M., 1992: Die Antikensammlung im Pergamonmuseum – Geschichte der Ausstellungen, Erwerbungen und Ausgrabungen, in Kunze, M. (ed.), Die Antikensammlung, Mainz, 9–20.Google Scholar
Larsen, M.T., 1994: The conquest of Assyria, London.Google Scholar
Landfester, M., 1996: Griechen und Deutsche: der Mythos einer ‘Wahlverwandtschaft’, in Berding, H. (ed.), Mythos und Nation. Studien zur Entwicklung des kollektiven Bewuβtseins in der Neuzeit, Frankfuurt a.M., 198–219.Google Scholar
Le Roy Ladurie, E., 1975: Montaillou, village occitan de 1294 à 1324, Paris.Google Scholar
Leon, W., 1989: The Margaret Woodbury Strong museum: a review, American quarterly 41, 526–542.Google Scholar
Lubar, S., 1997: Exhibiting memories, in Henderson, A. and Kaeppler, A. (eds), Exhibiting dilemmas. Issues of representation at the Smithsonian, Washington D.C., 15–27.Google Scholar
Lovatt, J.R., 1997: The people's show festival 1994: a survey, in Pearce, S.M. (ed.), Experiencing material culture in the western world, London, 196–221.Google Scholar
Lyotard, F., 1984: The postmodern condition. A report on knowledge, Manchester.Google Scholar
MacCannell, D., 1999: The tourist. A new theory of the leisure class, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Macdonald, S., 1998a: Exhibitions of power and powers of exhibition: an introduction to the politics of display, in Macdonald, S. (ed.), The politics of display. Museums, science, culture, London, 1–24.Google Scholar
Macdonald, S., 1998b: Supermarket science? Consumers and ‘the public understanding of science’, in Macdonald, S. (ed.), The politics of display. Museums, science, culture, London, 118–138.Google Scholar
Maleuvre, D., 1999: Museum memories. History, technology, art, Stanford.Google Scholar
Malraux, A., 1967: Museum without walls, Garden City (NY) (first edition 1947).Google Scholar
Marchand, S.L., 1996: Down from Olympus. Archaeology and philhellenism in Germany, 1750 – 1970, Princeton.Google Scholar
Marchand, S. and Grafton, A., 1997: Martin Bernal and his critics, Arion 5.2, 1–35.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H., 1937: Über den affirmativen Charakter der Kultur, Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6, 54–94.Google Scholar
Martin, J.-H., 1995: The ‘Musée Sentimental’ of Daniel Spoerri, in Cooke, L. and Wollen, P. (eds), Visual display. Culture beyond appearances, New York, 54–67.Google Scholar
Marx, K., 1974: Einleitung zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, Marx-Engels-Werke, 13, 613–644, Berlin.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and F., Engels, 1965: The German ideology, London.Google Scholar
Marzahn, J., 1992a: Geschichte des Vorderasiatischen Museums und kurzer Überblick über die Ausgrabungstätigkeit, in Staatliche Museen zu Berlin (ed.), Das Vorderasiatische Museum Berlin, Mainz, 11–18.Google Scholar
Marzahn, J., 1992b: Babylonien, in Staatliche Museen zu Berlin (ed.), Das Vorderasiatische Museum Berlin, Mainz, 95–141.Google Scholar
Marzahn, J., 1992c: Assyrien, in Staatliche Museen zu Berlin (ed.), Das Vorderasiatische Museum Berlin, Mainz, 142–194.Google Scholar
Massow, W. von, 1936: Führer durch das Pergamonmuseum, Berlin.Google Scholar
Mayrand, P., 1985: The new museology proclaimed, Museum 37, 200–201.Google Scholar
McTavish, L., 1998: Shopping in the museum? Consumer spaces and the redefinition of the Louvre, Cultural studies 12, 168–192.Google Scholar
Melhuish, C., 1997: The museum as a mirror of society, Architectural design 67 (11/12), 22–25.Google Scholar
Merriman, N., 1989: Museum visiting as a cultural phenomenon, in Vergo, P. (ed.), The new museology, London, 149–171.Google Scholar
Meyer, G.R., 1956: Durch vier Jahrtausende altvorderasiatischer Kultur. Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin.Google Scholar
Meyer, G.R., 1958: Schätze der Weltkultur von der Sowjetunion gerettet, Berlin.Google Scholar
Mohr, R., 2000: Operation Sauerbraten, Der Spiegel 45/2000, November 6.Google Scholar
Morris, M., 1988: Banality in cultural studies, Discourse 10 (2), 3–29.Google Scholar
Mönninger, M., 1999: Museums-Mall, Berliner Zeitung 7.6.1999.Google Scholar
Mönninger, M., 2000: Pergamon-Hof ohne Dach. Der letzte Wettbewerb auf der Museumsinsel ist entschieden, Berliner Zeitung 25.5.2000.Google Scholar
Mönninger, M. and Preuss, S., 1999: Ende eines Kulturkampfes. Und sie bewegt sich doch: die Preußen-Stiftung hat einen neuen Masterplan samt Generaldirektor, Berliner Zeitung 5.6.1999.Google Scholar
Monroe, D.L., 1995: Federal funding of museums: the reality, Museum news November/December, 50–51.Google Scholar
Munslow, A., 1997: Deconstructing history, London.Google Scholar
Müller, M., 1992: Kunstgeschichte zwischen affirmativer Kultur und Kulturindustrie, in Berndt, A., Kaiser, P., Rosenberg, A. and Trinkner, D. (eds), Frankfurter Schule und Kunstgeschichte, Berlin, 141–164.Google Scholar
Nipperdey, T., 1993: Deutsche Geschichte 1866–1918. Band I. Arbeitswelt und Bürgergeist, München.Google Scholar
Oberholtzer, C., 2000: Exhibit review essay. ‘First peoples, first contacts: tangible records’, American anthropologist 102(1), 139–146.Google Scholar
Paolozzi, E., 1985: Lost magic kingdoms, London.Google Scholar
Pearce, S.M., 1986: Objects as signs and symbols, Museums journal 86, 131–135.Google Scholar
Pearce, S.M., 1991: Objects in structures, in Pearce, S.M. (ed.), Museum studies in material culture, Washington D.C., 47–60.Google Scholar
Pearce, S.M., 1994: Objects as meaning; or narrating the past, in Pearce, S.M. (ed.), Interpreting objects and collections, London, 19–29.Google Scholar
Posner, R., 1991: Kultur als Zeichensystem. Zur semiotischen Explikation kulturwissenschaftlicher Grundbegriffe, in Assmann, A. and Harth, D. (eds), Kultur als Lebenswelt und Monument, Frankfurt a.M., 37–74.Google Scholar
Prakash, G., 1999: Another reason. Science and the imagination of modern India, Princeton.Google Scholar
Putz, U., 1999: Schleichwege ins Wäschemuseum, Berliner Zeitung 30.8.1999.Google Scholar
Rabinow, P., 1984: Introduction, in Rabinow, P. (ed.), The Foucault reader, New York, 3–29.Google Scholar
Roberts, L.C., 1997: From knowledge to narrative. Educators and the changing museum, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Rorty, R., 1989: Contingency, irony, and solidarity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, P. and Galard, J., 2000: The irresistible rise of the museum. Onward and upward or the end of the road? Apollo January, 30–34.Google Scholar
Rüsen, J., 1988: Für eine Didaktik historischer Museen, in Rüsen, J., Ernst, W. and Grüttner, H.T. (eds), Geschichte sehen. Beiträge zur Ästhetik historischer Museen, Pfaffenweiler, 9–20.Google Scholar
Schalles, H.J., 1986: Der Pergamonaltar zwischen Bewertung und Verwertbarkeit, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
Scheffler, K., 1921: Berliner Museumskrieg, Berlin.Google Scholar
Schiering, W., 1969: Zur Geschichte der Archäologie, in Hausmann, U. (ed.), Allgemeine Grundlagen der Archäologie, München, 11–162.Google Scholar
Schmidt, B., 1994: Postmoderne – Strategien des Vergessens, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
Schudson, M., 1997: Paper tigers. A sociologist follows cultural studies into the wilderness, Lingua franca August 1997, 49–56.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C., 1987: Re-constructing archaeology. Theory and practice, London.Google Scholar
Shelton, A., 1992: The recontextualization of culture: in UK museums, Anthropology today 8(5), 11–16.Google Scholar
Sherman, D.J., 1990: Museums and their discontents, Art history 13, 409–414.Google Scholar
Silver, J., 1988: ‘Astonished and somewhat terrified’: the preservation and development of aural culture, in Lumley, R. (ed.), The museum time machine. Putting cultures on display, London, 170–196.Google Scholar
Sorensen, C., 1989: Theme parks and time machines, in Vergo, P. (ed.), The new museology, London, 60–73.Google Scholar
Terrell, J., 1991: Disneyland and the future of museum anthropology, American anthropologist 93, 149–153.Google Scholar
Trouillot, M.-R., 1995: Silencing the past. Power and the production of history, Boston.Google Scholar
Truettner, W.H., 1997: For museum audiences: the ‘morning of a new day’?, in Henderson, A. and Kaeppler, A. (eds), Exhibiting dilemmas. Issues of representation at the Smithsonian, Washington D.C., 28–46.Google Scholar
Vestner, H., 1989: Berlin. Insight city guides, Singapore.Google Scholar
Vogel, S., 1991: Always true to the object, in our fashion, in Karp, I. and Lavine, S.D. (eds), Exhibiting cultures. The poetics and politics of museum display, Washington D.C., 191–204.Google Scholar
Walsh, K., 1992: The representation of the past. Museums and heritage in the post-modern world, London.Google Scholar
Weber, A., 1990: ‘Wir verkaufen den Leuten Träume’. Das Écomusée d'Alsace zwischen Kultur und Konsum, Geschichtswerkstatt 21, 9–14.Google Scholar
Wehler, H.U., 1988: Das deutsche Kaiserreich 1871–1918, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Weil, S.E., 1995: A cabinet of curiosities. Inquiries into museums and their prospects, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Weiss, P., 1983: Die Ästhetik des Widerstands, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
West, B., 1988: The making of the English working past: a critical view of the Ironbridge Gorge museum, in Lumley, R. (ed.), The museum time machine, London, 36–62.Google Scholar
White, H., 1978: Tropics of discourse. Essays in cultural criticism, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Wittlin, A.S., 1970: Museums in search of a useable future,Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
Wolf, E., 1982: Europe and the people without history, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Wright, P., 1989: The quality of visitor's experiences in art museums, in Vergo, P. (ed.), The new museology, London, 119–148.Google Scholar