Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T04:44:25.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrated. Dis-integrated. Coordinated. Re-integrated

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2013

John Gelder*
Affiliation:
RIBA Enterprises, Old Post Office, St Nicholas Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 1RH, UKjohn.gelder@theNBS.com

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This paper looks at the evolution of the structure of construction contract documentation over time, from ancient Greece through to the near future, in terms of the degree to which the contract documentation is integrated. Documentation might comprise anything from a single ‘integrated’ text to a range of ‘dis-integrated’ documents, fashioned by different players in the procurement process and not offering an easily appreciable integrated whole. The paper ends with the hope that new digital methods of information production will lead to better integrated and more easily readable ‘wholes’ in the new forms offered by building information modelling (BIM), which in turn will facilitate collaborative working.

The paper shows that contract documentation has evolved through four stages of integration: Integrated: up to the end of the medieval period construction contract documentation was essentially fully integrated – everything that was required was stated in the one written document, which typically covered contract conditions, building layouts, assembly descriptions, quantities of components and requirements for quality.

Information

Type
practice
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012