Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T12:15:22.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ARLIS Committees and Working Parties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Gaye Smith
Gaye Smith*
Affiliation:
Art, Design and Humanities, The Manchester Metropolitan University Library, Manchester
Get access

Abstract

From its earliest days ARLIS has carried out its work through committees and working parties: the Education Committee (which has organised conferences and courses since 1972), two standards working parties (which have produced guidelines on standards for art libraries), the Cataloguing and Classification Committee (which ‘was preceded by working parties on the Dewey Decimal Classification system and on the Anglo American Cataloguing Rules) and the Visual Resources Committee. A diagram shows the relationship of committees and working parties to Council. (The ARLIS committees concerned with the national coordination of art library resources, and with international matters, are discussed elsewhere in this issue of the Journal.)

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , 1994, pp. 27 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Notes

1. ARLIS Newsletter no. 1 October 1969, p.8-11.

2. ARLIS Newsletter no. 14 March 1973, p.2-9.

3. Guidelines for art and design libraries: stock, planning, staffing and autonomy. ARLIS, 1990.

4. ARLIS Education Committee minutes, 10 November 1972.

5. Carrick, Neville. How to find out about the arts. Pergamon, 1965 Google Scholar.

6. ARLIS Education Committee minutes, 19 July 1972.

7. Pacey, Philip (ed). Art library manual: a guide to resources and practice. Bowker, 1977 Google Scholar.

8. Avann, Mike and Wood, Kath (eds). User education in art and design: theory into practice. ARLIS, 1980 Google Scholar.

9. ARLIS Education Committee Annual Report, 1992-3.

10 ARLIS News-sheet nos. 36 and 37 1982.

11 ARLIS Newsletter no. 5 September 1970 and no. 6 December 1970.

12. ARLIS News-sheet no. 1 June 1976, p.2.

13. Faughey, John. Report on the Dewey Decimal Classification Working Party. ARLIS, 1978 Google Scholar.

14. Bowman, John (Compiler). Art Libraries Journal and ARLIS/UK and Eire News-sheet: ten year index 1976-1985. ARLIS, 1993 Google Scholar.

15. Bowman, John. ‘ARLIS and Dewey’. ARLIS News-sheet no. 88 January/February 1991, p.2–3 Google Scholar.

16. Letter from Philip Pacey, ARLIS Chairman, to the Minister for the Arts, December 1980.

17. Connor, Patricia. ‘V and A: a slide to disaster?’ Sunday Times March 1 1981, p.40 Google Scholar.

18. ‘Recent amputations at the V and A’ (Editorial). Burlington Magazine March 1981, p.133.

19. Letter from Bertie Maxwell to Gillian Varley, ARLIS Secretary, 15 December 1978.

20. ARLIS/NA Standards Committee. Standards for art libraries and fine arts slide collections. ARLIS/NA, 1983. (Occasional papers, 2).

21. Davis, Ron. ‘The professional status of slide curators’. ARLIS News-sheet no. 55 July/August 1985, p.3–5 Google Scholar.

22. McKeown, Roy. National survey of slide collections. London: British Library, 1989 Google Scholar. (BLRD Paper, 67).

23. McKeown, Roy. National directory of slide collections. London: British Library, 1990 Google Scholar. (British Library Information Guide, 12).

24. Guidelines for the layout and content of booksellers’ catalogues. ARLIS, 1987.

25. Smith, Gaye and Jackson, Lotta. ARLIS/UK and Eire national collecting network for art exhibition catalogues. London: British Library, 1990 Google Scholar. (British Library Research Paper, 87).

26. Op. cit. 22.

27. A Library and Information Plan for the Visual Arts. ARLIS/UK and Ireland on behalf of the VALIP Steering Committee, 1993. (British Library Research and Development Report, 6111).