Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T14:49:23.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The end-user and the art librarian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

James C. Boyles
James C. Boyles*
Affiliation:
State University of New York College at Purchase, Purchase, New York 10577, USA
Get access

Abstract

New technology is giving researchers greater independence in their use of bibliographic databases. Art librarians should promote ‘end-user services’ which provide library users with direct access to online databases, although there are a number of problems which are liable to detract from the efficiency and thoroughness associated with computer-assisted searching.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , 1988, pp. 27 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Ojala, Marydee. “Views on end-user searching”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 37, no.4, July 1986, p. 197 3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Hunter, Janne A. “When your patrons want to search the library as advisor to endusers … A Compendium of advice and tips”. Online, v.8, no.3, May 1984, p.36–41 Google Scholar
3. Sullivan, Patricia and Seiden, Peggy. “Educating online catalog users: the protocol assessment of needs”. Library Hi Tech, V.3, no.2, 1985, p. 14.Google Scholar
4. Lancaster, F. W. “Studies in catalog use”, in The Measurement and Evaluation of Library Services. Arlington, VA: Information Resources Press, 1977. p. 19–72 (quoted in Lewis, David W., “Research on the use of online catalogs and its implications for library practices”. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, v. 13, no.3, July 1987, p. 152–153).Google Scholar
5. Deiss, Kathryn. “Databases: artful reference tools or convenient alibis?” Paper delivered at ARLIS/NA conference, New York, February 9, 1987, and published in this issue of the Art Libraries Journal.Google Scholar
6. Littlejohn, Alice C. “End-user searching in an academic library the students’ view”. RO, v.26, no.4, Summer 1987, p.463. See also Penhale, Sara J. and Taylor, Nancy. “Integrating enduser searching into a bibliographic instruction program”. RO, v.26, no.2, Winter 1986, p.214.Google Scholar
7. Pisciotta, Henry. “Database searching with gateway software”. Art Documentation, v.4, no.1, Spring 1985, p.3–5.Google Scholar
8. Boyles, James C. “Bibliographic databases for the art researcher: developments, problems and proposals”. Art Documentation, v.6, no.l, Spring 1987, p.9–12.Google Scholar
9. Janke, Richard V. “Online after six: enduser searching comes of age”. Online, v.8, no.6, November 1984, p. 9.Google Scholar
10. Ward, Sandra N. and Osegueda, Laura M.. “Teaching university student end-users about online searching”. Science & Technology Libraries, v.5, Fall 1984, p.25.Google Scholar
11. “RILA and RAA to merge”. News from RILA, no.4, February 1986, p.3.Google Scholar
12. Tenopir, Carol “What’s new with WILSONLINE”. Library Journal, v.III, no.10, 1 June 1986, p.98.Google Scholar
13. Halperin, Michael and Pagell, Ruth A.. “Free ‘do-ityourself online searching … what to expect”. Online, v.9, no.2, March 1985, p.84.Google Scholar