Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T03:15:24.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

National art libraries: monoliths or artels?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Clive Phillpot*
Affiliation:
The Museum of Modern Art, New York
Get access

Abstract

The ideal of a single, national art library is no more practicable than that of a single national library. The alternative is to regard all of a nation’s art libraries as comprising the national art library, taking advantage of their diversity and of their provision of a range of access points and policies. This requires effective co-ordination, preferably combining maximum co-operation with a minimum of centralisation, and including the rotation of specific responsibilities among participating libraries. An example of such a confederation of art libraries is represented by the network of art libraries within the Research Libraries Group (RLG) in the USA. A new RLG plan for achieving efficient co-operative cataloguing of exhibition catalogues demonstrates how a confederation of libraries can work together to act as a national art library, more effectively than would be possible for a single ‘monolithic’ library.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable