Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T19:25:08.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relative values: the words about ‘non-western’ art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Rebecca Coombes
Rebecca Coombes*
Affiliation:
National Art Library, Victoria and Albert Museum, London, UK
Get access

Abstract

A survey of holdings of non-Western art in British, and some North American, art libraries has by and large confirmed that it is poorly represented, and that contemporary non-Western art is especially neglected. Libraries’ freedom to acquire material in this broad area may be restricted or defined by curricula, the interests of clients, and the availability of material, yet libraries which allow themselves to be thus constrained present a distorted and impoverished view of world art. Library classification schemes tend to favour Western art, with non-Western art sometimes being relegated to ‘crafts’ or ‘anthropology’, while subject descriptors sometimes employ inappropriate terminology.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , 1995, pp. 19 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Jantes, Gavin. ‘The words about us’. Art Libraries Journal, Winter 1983, vol. 8 no. 4, p. 14–22.Google Scholar
2. Chambers, Eddie. ‘Beyond ethnic arts’. Circa, March/April 1985, no. 21, p. 6–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Benedetti, Joan M. ‘Who are the folk in folk art? Inside and outside the cultural context.’ Art Documentation, Spring 1987, vol. 6 no. 1, p. 3–8.Google Scholar
4. Makino, Yasuko. ‘East Asian art materials: towards solving problems of collection development and management.’ Art Documentation, Fall 1987, vol. 6 no. 3, p. 15–16.Google Scholar
5. Varley, Gillian. Art and Design Documentation in the UK and Ireland: a directory of resources. ARLIS/UK & Ireland, 1993.Google Scholar
6. Ward, L. ‘The documentation of contemporary black British art’. ARLIS Newsheet, March 1985, no. 53, p. 15–16.Google Scholar
7. Stanley, Janet L. ‘African art and AAT’. Art Documentation, Fall 1985, vol. 4 no. 3, p.103–105.Google Scholar
8. Trujillo, Roberto G. & , Weber R., , David C. ‘Academic library responses to cultural diversity: a position paper for the 1990s’. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1991, vol. 17 no. 3, p. 157–161.Google Scholar
9. Scarborough, Katherine. ‘Collections for the emerging majority’. Library Journal, June 1991, vol. 116 no.11, p. 44–47.Google Scholar
10. ARLIS/NA update. 1994, no. 3, p. 8.Google Scholar
11. Vansina, J. Art history in Africa: an introduction to method. London: New York: Longman Inc., 1984.Google Scholar
12. West, W Richard Jr.. ‘Foreword’. In Hill, Tom & Sr.Hill, Richard W. (eds.) Creation’s Journey: Native American identity and belief. London: Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1994.Google Scholar
13. Fawcett, Trevor. ‘Beyond the gossip shop’. Art Libraries Journal, 1994, vol. 19 no. 3, p. 8–12.Google Scholar
14. Jones, David. ‘Dealing with the past’. Museums Journal, January 1992, vol. 2, p. 24–26.Google Scholar