No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
The legacies of the Fukushima nuclear accident remain hotly contested in the media, academia, the courts and public debate because various actors have much at stake in contemporary battles over the future of nuclear energy, the national economy, decommissioning of the stricken reactors and public memory. Here I examine some aspects of this vibrant discourse and how the trauma of Fukushima is evolving.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- Copyright © The Authors 2022
References
Sources
Acton, James and Hibbs, Mark, (2012) Why Fukushima was preventable. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, March 6, 2012.Google Scholar
Akiyama, Nobumasa, 2016, “Political leadership in nuclear emergency: institutional and structural constraints” in Sagan, Scott and Blanchard, Edward, eds, Learning from a Disaster: Improving Nuclear Safety and Security after Fukushima. Stanford, CA: Stanford Security Studies, pp. 80–108.Google Scholar
Alderman, Liz and Reed, Stanley, “Nuclear power could help Europe cuts its Russia ties, but not for years,” New York Times April 26.Google Scholar
Asahi, (2022). “TEPCO pushes back timeline for storage tanks at Fukushima plant”, Asahi Shimbun. April 28.Google Scholar
Asahi, . (2021a) “Editorial: Public's distrust of TEPCO runs deeper than its water tanks” Asahi Shimbun. April 14.Google Scholar
Asahi, , (2021b) Ex-TEPCO executives again plead not guilty to nuke accident“ Asahi Shimbun, November 3.Google Scholar
Barrett, Brendan, DeWit, Andrew and Yarime, Masaru, (2020) “Japanese smart cities and communities: Integrating technological and institutional innovation for Society 5.0” in Kim, Hyung-Min, et al. (ed.), Smart Cities for Technological and Social Innovation:Case Studies, Current Trends, and Future Steps. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science & Technology, 2020. pp. 73–94.Google Scholar
Behr, Peter and Fialka, John. (2011) “US experts blame Fukushima 1 explosions and radiation on failed venting system” New York Times, March 25.Google Scholar
Cabinet of Japan (2012). Investigation committee on the accident at Fukushima nuclear power stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company. Final Report. 23 July. (accessed April 30, 2022).Google Scholar
Clenfield, J. (2011). Japan disaster caps decades of faked reports, accidents. Bloomberg Business News. 18 March 2011.Google Scholar
DeWit, Andrew (2020) “The Japan Renewable Energy Institute's Proposal for the 2030 Energy Mix” Asia Pacific Journal Japan Focus, 18:7(4) September 1.Google Scholar
Diet. (2012) The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. Executive Summary. Tokyo: National Diet of Japan.Google Scholar
Dooley, Ben and Ueno, Hisako, (2021), “Furor in Japanese town casts light on Fukushima's legacy” New York Times, March 10.Google Scholar
Fackler, Martin. (2021) “Media capture: The Japanese Press and Fukushima” in Cleveland, Kyle, Knowles, Scott and Shineha, Ryuma, ed., The Legacies of Fukushima. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 112–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fackler, Martin. (2013)“Japan stepping in to help clean up atomic plant” New York Times, August 7, 2013.Google Scholar
FCCJ (2022). “Fukushima Thyroid-Cancer Victims Take TEPCO to Court” FCCJ Press Conference, March 2.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles and Jansson, Mark. (2013) “Regulating Japanese nuclear power in the wake o the Fukushima Daiichi accident” Federation of American Scientists, May.Google Scholar
Hamada, Kentaro (2015) “Fukushima operator's mounting legal woes to fuel nuclear opposition” Reuters, August 17.Google Scholar
Hatamura, Yotaro, et al. (2014) The 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Accident. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing.Google Scholar
Hymans, Jacques. (2011) “Veto Players, Nuclear Energy, and Nonproliferation” International Security, Vol. 36, No. 2:154–189 (Fall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inajima, Tsuyoshi and Oda, Shoko, (2022). “Nuclear power's fan base in Japan faces a reality check”, Bloomberg. April 6.Google Scholar
Isobe, Yoshitaka, (2022). “Survey: Record 64% of Japanese want national defense bolstered” Asahi Shimbun, May 2.Google Scholar
JCER. (2019) “Accident cleanup costs rising to 35-80 trillion yen in forty years” Japan Center for Economic Research, July 3.Google Scholar
Jensterle, Miha and Venjakob, Maike (2019). Smart power grids and integration of renewables in Japan. Current activities concerning smart grids implementation, energy system digitisation and integration of renewables. Berlin: adelphi.Google Scholar
Johnson, David, Fukurai, Hiroshi and Hirayama, Mari (2020). “Reflections on the TEPCO trial: prosecution and acquittal after Japan's nuclear meltdown” Asia Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 18:2(1) January 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, Jeff. (2021) “The development state and nuclear power in Japan” in Cleveland, Kyle, Knowles, Scott and Shineha, Ryuma, eds., Legacies of Fukushima. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Kingston, Jeff. (2016) “Devastating Consequences, Flawed Responses: Assessing Japan's 3.11 Earthquake, Tsunami and Nuclear Tragedies” in Daly, P. and Feeny, R.M., eds., Rebuilding Asia Following Natural Disasters. Cambridge, UK. Cambridge University Press, 367–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, Jeff. (2014) “After 3.11: Imposing Nuclear Energy on a Skeptical Japanese Public,” The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol. 11, Issue 23, No. 4, June 9.Google Scholar
Kingston, Jeff. (2012) “Japan's Nuclear Village”, The Asia-Pacific Journal 10:37 1 (10 September).Google Scholar
Kyodo, . (2022) “No safety flaws found so far in Fukushima water discharge plan: IAEA” April 30.Google Scholar
Lochbaum, David. (2014) Fukushima: The story of a nuclear disaster. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Lukner, Kerstin and Sakaki, Alexandra, (2013)“Lessons from Fukushima: An Assessment of the Investigations of the Nuclear Disaster,” The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol 11 Issue 19, No. 2, May 13.Google Scholar
Mainichi, (2022a) “6 people to sue TEPCO over thyroid cancer after Fukushima nuclear disaster.” Mainichi, January 21.Google Scholar
Mainichi, (2022b) “Japan's top court orders TEPCO to pay damages over Fukushima crisis.” Mainichi March 4.Google Scholar
Mainichi, (2022c) “Editorial: Ruling pressures Japan to set proper damages for Fukushima nuclear disaster.” Mainichi, March 19.Google Scholar
Mainichi, (2022d). “Construction projects surge at Fukushima nuclear plant despite decommissioning progress.” Mainichi, April 4.Google Scholar
Mainichi, (2017), “55% oppose restarting nuclear reactors, 26% in favor: Mainichi survey”, Mainichi, March 13.Google Scholar
Mainichi, (2016) “Experts divided on causes of high thyroid cancer rates among Fukushima children” Mainichi, March 7.Google Scholar
McCurry, Justin. (2017) “Fukushima operator can restart nuclear reactors at world's biggest plant” Guardian, October 4.Google Scholar
McCurry, Justin. (2013) “Fukushima 50: ‘We felt like kamikaze pilots ready to sacrifice everything’ Guardian. January 11.Google Scholar
McCurry, Justin. (2012). “Fukushima disaster could have been avoided, nuclear plant operator admits” Guardian. October 15.Google Scholar
Nanami, Nakagawa (2021) “Evacuation complete with 227 patients left behind during Fukushima disaster”, Tansa (Tokyo Investigative Newsroom. March 10.Google Scholar
Nikkei, , (2021). “Japan bans TEPCO from restarting nuclear plant over safety flaws.” Nikkei, April 14.Google Scholar
Rich, Motoko and Hida, Hikari (2022), “Japan says it needs nuclear power. Can host towns ever trust it again?” New York Times, May 4.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Tom. (2018) Fukushima Nuclear Plant: tsunami wall could have avoided disaster but boss scrapped the plan, employee testifies“ Newsweek, April 14.Google Scholar
Oda, Shoko and Reynolds, Isabel. (2022) “Kishida says nuclear power should be reconsidered as energy costs soar” Bloomberg, April 27.Google Scholar
Ogawa, Kazuhiro, (2021). “Japan faces nuclear reckoning as retired reactors restart” Nikkei, April 29.Google Scholar
Ota, Hisashi. (2014) “Fukushima workers tried to save reactor 1 through venting” Japan Times, September 2.Google Scholar
RJIF. (2014) Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident, The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Disaster: Investigating the Myth and Reality. (Expanded and updated English edition of the Report by The Independent Investigation Commission on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident, Rebuild Japan Initiative Foundation originally published in Japanese on 1 March 2012) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosen, Alex. (2021) “Latest results of the Fukushima thyroid screenings confirm worrying trend” Beyond Nuclear International. May 23.Google Scholar
Ryu, Airin and Meshkati, Najmedin. (2014) “Onagawa: The Japanese nuclear power plant that didn't melt down on 3/11.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. March 10.Google Scholar
Sheldrick, Adam and Foster, Malcolm. (2018) “Tepco's ice wall fails to freeze Fukushima's toxic water buildup” Reuters. March 8.Google Scholar
Statista, . 2021. “Share of Japanese people who support the use of nuclear energy from 2012 to 2021. March.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tomohito. (2013). “DPJ's Political Leadership in Response to the Fukushima Nuclear Accident”, Japanese Journal of Political Science 14 (2) 243–259Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access