Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T19:49:36.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ability is not general, and neither are the conclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2001

Robert J. Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Yale University, Department of Psychology, New Haven, CT 06520-8205 robert.sternberg@yale.edu www.yale.edu/rjsternberg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Stanovich & West rely for many of their conclusions on correlations of reasoning tasks with SAT scores. The conclusions they draw are suspect because the SAT is not a particularly good measure of so-called g; g is not necessarily causal, SAT scores are no arbiter of what is true, and in any case it is not suprising that reasoning tests correlate with reasoning tests.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , October 2000, pp. 697 - 698
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press