Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T13:43:49.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conceptual problems in the act-versus-pattern analysis of self-control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Suresh Kanekar
Affiliation:
4626 Bancroft Street, #13, San Diego, CA 92116

Abstract

The primary argument against Rachlin's act-versus-pattern analysis of self-control is that it is wrong to think of a temptation as a solitary act while the alternative is conceived of as an element of a pattern. Either both are solitary acts or both are members of patterns, however different the patterns may be in their complexity and abstractness.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable