Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:52:33.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does manifestness solve problems of mutuality?

Review products

Commentary onSperberDan and WilsonDeirdre (1987) Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition. BBS 10: 697–754.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Alan Garnham  and
Josef Perner
Alan Garnham
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, England, Electronic mail: alang@epvax.sussex.ac.uk
Josef Perner
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, England, Electronic mail: josef@epvax.sussex.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 178 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Clark, H. H. & Marshall, C. R. (1981) Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In: Elements of Discourse Understanding, ed. Joshi, A. K., Webber, B. & Sag, I.. Cambridge University Press. [rDS, AG]Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. (1987) Relevance theory, mutual knowledge, and accidental irrelevance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10: 717–18. [rDS, AG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1987) The relevance of Relevance for psychological theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10: 718–19. [rDS, AG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkelman, E. (1987) Relevance: Computation and coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10: 720–21. [rDS, AG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. K. (1969) Convention: A philosophical study. In: Harvard University Press [rDS, AG]Google Scholar
Pemer, J. & Gamhain, A. (1989) Conditions for mutuality. Journal of Semantics 6: 369–85. [rDS, AG]Google Scholar
Politzer, G. (1986) Laws of language use and formal logic. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 15: 47–92. [rDS, GP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rips, L. J. (1983) Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning. Psychological Review 90: 38–71. [rDS, GP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, S. (1972) Meaning. In: Oxford University Press [rDS, AG]Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Harvard University Press. [rDS, AG]Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1987). Precis of Relevance: Communication and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10(4):697–754. [rDS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar