Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T18:24:20.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolution, teleology, intentionality

Review products

Commentary onDennettDaniel C. (1988) Précis of The Intentional Stance. BBS 11:495–546.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Daniel C. Dennett
Daniel C. Dennett
Affiliation:
Center for Cognitive Studies, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155-7068
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Author's Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 389 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amundson, R. (1989) The trials and tribulations of selectionist explanations. In: Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology, ed. Hahlweg, K. & Hooker, C. A.. State University of New York Press. [JR]Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1907) De anima. (Hicks, R. B., Trans.). Cambridge University Press. [JR]Google Scholar
Beatty, J. (1980) Optimal design models and the strategy of model building in evolutionary biology. Philosophy of Science 47:532–61. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, W. (1986) Teleological functional analyses and the hierarchical organization of nature. In: Current issues in teleology, ed. Rescher, N.. University Press of America. [JR]Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1976) Linguistic behaviour. Cambridge University Press. (2nd edition [1990] published by Hackett.) [JB, JR]Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1983) Cognitive ethology: Theory or poetry? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6:356–58. [JB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. (1991a) How to read minds in behaviour: A suggestion from a philosopher. In: Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading, ed. Whiten, A.. Basil Blackwell. [JB]Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1991b) How is cognitive ethology possible? In: Cognitive ethology: The minds of other animals, ed. Ristau, C. A.. Erlbaum. [JB]Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1991c) Folk psychological explanations. In: The future of folk psychology: Intentionality and cognitive science, ed. Greenwood, J. D.. Oxford University Press. [JB]Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. (1975) The identity of propositions. In: Meaning, reference and necessity: New studies in semantics, ed. Blackburn, S.. Cambridge University Press. [rDCD, JB]Google Scholar
Block, N. (1980) What is functionalism? In: Readings in philosophy of psychology, ed. Block, N.. Harvard University Press. [JB]Google Scholar
Brandon, R. (1981) Biological teleology: Questions and explanations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 12:91–105. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtt, E. (1951) The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science. (Revised ed.) Humanities Press. [JR]Google Scholar
Churchland, Paul (1979) Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge University Press. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R. (1990) Parasite power. Science News 138:200–02. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, L. & Cain, J. (1989) Selection type theories. Philosophy of Science 56:106–29. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1923) The origin of species by means of natural selection (Sixth edition). D. Appleton. [JR]Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1974) Why the law of effect will not go away. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior 5:169–87. [JB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1978) Why the law of effect will not go away. In: Brainstorms. Bradford Books. [JR]Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1987) The intentional stance. MIT Press/Bradford Books. [rDCD, JB, JR]Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1988) Précis of The Intentional Stance [followed by Open Peer Commentary and Author's Response]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:495–546. [JB, JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1990a) Ways of establishing harmony. In: Dretske and his critics, ed. McLaughlin, B.. Blackwell. [rDCD]Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1990b) The interpretation of texts, people, and other artifacts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50:177–94. [rDCD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1990c) Dr. Pangloss knows best [reply to Amundson]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13:581–82. [rDCD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1991a) Real Patterns. Journal of Philosophy 87:27–51. [rDCD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1991b) Do-it-yourself understanding. Center for Cognitive Studies Preprint CSS-90–4, Tufts University, Medford, MA. [rDCD]Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1985) Machines and the mental. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 59:23–33. [JB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. (1986) Misrepresentation. In: Belief, ed. Bogdan, R.. Oxford University Press. [rDCD, JB]Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1988a) The stance stance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11(3):511–12. [JB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. (1988b) Explaining behavior: Reasons in a world of causes. MIT Press/Bradford Books. [rDCD]Google Scholar
Driesch, H. (1914) The history and theory of vitalism. (Ogden, C. K., Trans.) Macmillan. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, J. (1987) The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality. MIT Press. [JR]Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. (1969) The triumph of the Darwinian method. University of California Press. [JR]Google Scholar
Gould, S. (1980) Caring groups and selfish genes. In: The Panda's Thumb. W. W. Norton. (Reprinted in Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology: An anthology, ed. E. Sober. MIT Press. [JR]Google Scholar
Gould, S. & Lewontin, R. (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society. B205:581–98. Reprinted in Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology: An anthology, ed. E. Sober. MIT Press. [JR]Google Scholar
Holling, C. (1964) The analysis of complex population processes. Canadian Entomologist 96:335–47. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1990) The critique of practical judgment. Hackett. [JR]Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press. [JR]Google Scholar
Lehman, H. (1965) Functional explanations in biology. Philosophy of Science 32:1–20 [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenoir, T. (1982) The strategy of life: Teleology and mechanics in 19th century German biology. D. Reidel. [JR]Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. (1979) Fitness, survival, and optimality. In: Analysis of ecological systems, ed. Horn, D., Stairs, G. & Mitchell, R.. Ohio State University. [JR]Google Scholar
Mace, C. A. (1935) Mechanical and teleological explanation. In: Science, History, and Theology (Aristotelian Society, Supplementary). 14:22–45. Harrison & Sons Ltd. [JR]Google Scholar
Maull, N. (1977) Unifying science without reduction. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 9:143–62. Reprinted in Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology: An anthology. MIT Press. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. (1984) Language, thought, and other biological categories: New foundations for Realism. MIT Press. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. (1989) In defense of proper functions. Philosophy of Science 56:288–302. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, E. (1977) Teleology revisited. The Journal of Philosophy 74:61–300.Google Scholar
Papineau, D. (1984) Representation and explanation. Philosophy of Science. 51:550–72. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1960) Word and object. MIT Press. [rDCD, JB, JR]Google Scholar
Ringen, J. (1976) Explanation, teleology, and operant behaviorism: A study of the experimental analysis of purposive behavior. Philosophy of Science 43:223–53. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringen, J. (1985) Operant conditioning and a paradox of teleology. Philosophy of Science 52:565–77. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringen, J. (1986) The completeness of behavior theory: A review of Behaviorism, science, and human nature by Barry Schwartz & Hugh Lacey. Behaviorism 14:29–39. [JR]Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (1971) Function statements in biology. Philosophy of Science 38:87–95. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanahan, T. (1990) Evolution, phenotypic selection, and the units of selection. Philosophy of Science 57:210–25. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1969) Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts. [JR]Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1984) The evolution of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 41:217–21. [JR]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sober, E. (1981) Evolutionary theory and the ontological status of properties. Philosophical Studies 40:147–76. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (1984) The nature of selection. MIT Press. [JR]Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1985) Methodological behaviorism, evolution, and game theory. In: Sociobiolagy and epistemology, ed. Fetzer, J.. D. Reidel. [JR]Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1986) Comments on Rosenberg's review. Behaviorism 14:89–96. [JR]Google Scholar
Staddon, J. E. R. (1983) Adaptive behavior and learning. Cambridge University Press. [JR]Google Scholar
Stich, S. (1983) From folk psychology to cognitive science: The case against belief. MIT Press. [JR]Google Scholar
Stich, S. (1988) Connectionism, Realism and realism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11(3):531–32. [JB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1964) The explanation of behaviour. Humanities Press. [JR]Google Scholar
von Wright, G. (1971) Explanation and understanding. Cornell University Press. [JR]Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1972) Teleology and the logical structure of function statements. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 3:1–80. [JR]Google Scholar
Wright, L. (1976) Teleological explanations. University of California Press. [JR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar