Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T14:21:04.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The implications of Koehler's approach for fact finding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Craig R. Callen
Affiliation:
Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law, Jackson, MS 39201callen@csc.mc.edu

Abstract

Koehler's work will assist the effort to understand legal fact finding. It leaves two questions somewhat open: (i) the extent to which empirical research can measure correctness of fact-finding, a function that involves the resolution of normative questions and (ii) the standards judges should use in the absence of the research he advocates.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable