Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T19:15:51.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On determining what is unconscious and what is perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

David Navon
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 31999, Israel

Extract

In sum, dichotic listening tasks are appropriate for testing whether perception requires attention. The separate issue of the possible presence of perception that can never be brought under the spotlight of awareness should indeed be investigated by paradigms such as masking. However, the ultimate criterion for availability to awareness must be phenomenal experience. The discrepancy between thresholds of different perceptual indices is an important empirical finding, but its theoretical interpretation is not straightforward. In addition, it is suggested that we worry about the possibility that so-called indirect evidence reflects side effects of perceptual processing rather than the contents of its final product. In that case, what are being observed are vestiges of the processing of stimuli that do not make it to awareness. Whether those stimuli are below the threshold for overt response is an open question.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable