Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T15:03:19.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Animal concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1998

Colin Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4237 colin.allen@tamu.edu snaefell.tamu.edu/~colin/
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Millikan's account of concepts is applicable to questions about concepts in nonhuman animals. I raise three questions in this context: (1) Does classical conditioning entail the possession of simple concepts? (2) Are movement property concepts more basic than substance concepts? (3) What is the empirical content of claiming that concept meanings do not necessarily change as dispositions change?

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press