Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T05:21:54.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attending, intending, and the importance of task settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2002

Jason Ivanoff and
Raymond Klein
Jason Ivanoff
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4J1 ji@or.psychology.dal.ca ray.klein@dal.ca http://www.dal.ca/~klein/
Raymond Klein
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4J1 ji@or.psychology.dal.ca ray.klein@dal.ca http://www.dal.ca/~klein/
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Hommel et al. emphasize that the Theory of Event Coding (TEC)'s utility is not its ability to be a new theory of cognition, but its ability to engender new thinking about new and old problems. In this commentary we use the TEC to re-examine a long-standing discrepancy in the attention literature.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 5 , October 2001, pp. 889 - 890
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press