Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T22:02:08.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

betrayal aversion is reasonable

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2005

jonathan j. koehler  and
andrew d. gershoff
jonathan j. koehler
Affiliation:
behavioral decision making faculty, mccombs school of business, the university of texas at austin, austin, tx 78712-0212 koehler@mail.utexas.edu http://www.mccombs.utexas.edu/faculty/jonathan.koehler/
andrew d. gershoff
Affiliation:
department of marketing, michigan business school, university of michigan, ann arbor, mi 48109-1234 agershof@umich.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

we accept sunstein's claim that people often use moral heuristics to make judgments and decisions. however, in situations that include a risk of betrayal, we disagree with sunstein about when the relevant moral heuristic may be said to “misfire.” we suggest that the moral heuristic people apply to avoid the possibility of safety-product betrayal may be reasonable.

Information

Type
open peer commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , August 2005 , pp. 556 - 557
Copyright
2005 cambridge university press