No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Beyond rationality: Rigor without mortis in game theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 October 2003
Abstract:
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Psychological game theory encompasses formal theories designed to remedy game-theoretic indeterminacy and to predict strategic interaction more accurately. Its theoretical plurality entails second-order indeterminacy, but this seems unavoidable. Orthodox game theory cannot solve payoff-dominance problems, and remedies based on interval-valued beliefs or payoff transformations are inadequate. Evolutionary game theory applies only to repeated interactions, and behavioral ecology is powerless to explain cooperation between genetically unrelated strangers in isolated interactions. Punishment of defectors elucidates cooperation in social dilemmas but leaves punishing behavior unexplained. Team reasoning solves problems of coordination and cooperation, but aggregation of individual preferences is problematic.
Information
- Type
- Author's Response
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003
References
Ainslie, G. (2001) Breakdown of will. Cambridge University Press. [JM]10.1017/CBO9781139164191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainslie, G. & Monterosso, J. (2003) Building blocks of self-control: Increased tolerance for delay with bundled rewards. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 79:83–94. [JM]10.1901/jeab.2003.79-37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, R. D. (1987) The biology of moral systems. Aldine de Gruyter. [PB, DJB, rAMC]Google Scholar
Allais, M. & Hagen, O. (1979) Expected utility theory and the Allais paradox. Kluwer. [KS]Google Scholar
Alvard, M. (in press) The adaptive nature of culture. Evolutionary Anthropology. [MA]Google Scholar
Anand, P. (1990) Two types of utility: An experimental investigation into the prevalence of causal and evidential utility maximization. Greek Economic Review 12:58–74. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. & Schooler, L. J. (1991) Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science 2(6):396–408. [MJ]10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00174.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. B., Tweney, R. D., Rivardo, M. & Duncan, S. (1997) Need probability affects retention: A direct demonstration. Memory and Cognition 25(6):867–72. [MJ]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andras, P., Roberts, G. & Lazarus, J. (2003) Environmental risk, cooperation and communication complexity. In: Adaptive agents and multi-agent systems, ed. Alonso, E., Kudenko, D. & Kazakov, D.. Springer-Verlag. [JL]Google Scholar
Andreoni, J. & Miller, J. H. (1993) Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Experimental evidence. The Economic Journal 103:570–85. [aAMC]10.2307/2234532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonelli, G. A. & Bicchieri, C. (1994) Backwards forward induction. In: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference (TARK 1994), pp. 24–43, ed. Fagin, R.. Morgan Kaufmann. [aAMC]10.1016/B978-1-4832-1453-5.50006-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1963) Social choice and individual values, 2nd edition. Wiley. [arAMC, RS]Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J., Colombatto, E., Perlman, M. & Schmidt, C., eds. (1996) The rational foundations of economic behavior: Proceedings of the IEA Conference, Turin, Italy. Macmillan. [aAMC]10.1057/9780230389724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. J. (1976) Agreeing to disagree. Annals of Statistics 4:1236–39. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. J. (1995) Backward induction and common knowledge of rationality. Games and Economic Behavior 8:6–19. [aAMC]10.1016/S0899-8256(05)80015-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. J. (1996) A note on backward induction: Reply to Binmore. Games and Economic Behavior 17: 138–46. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. J. (1998) On the Centipede game. Games and Economic Behavior 23:97–105. [aAMC]10.1006/game.1997.0605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, R. J. (2000) Economic theory and mathematical method: An interview. In: Aumann, R. J., Collected papers, vol. 1. MIT Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Aumann, R. J. & Brandenburger, A. (1995) Epistemic conditions for Nash equilibrium. Econometrica 63:1161–80. [aAMC]10.2307/2171725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1997) The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton University Press. [aAMC, JL]10.1515/9781400822300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–96. [JL]10.1126/science.7466396CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bacharach, M. (1987) A theory of rational decision in games. Erkenntnis 27:17–55. [aAMC]10.1007/BF00697669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacharach, M. (1993) Variable universe games. In: Frontiers of game theory, ed. Binmore, K., Kirman, A. & Tani, P.. MIT Press. [arAMC, MCJ]Google Scholar
Bacharach, M. (1999) Interactive team reasoning: A contribution to the theory of co-operation. Research in Economics 53:117–47. [aAMC, SH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacharach, M. & Hurley, S. (1991) Issues and advances in the foundations of decision theory. In: Foundations of decision theory, ed. Bacharach, M. & Hurley, S.. Blackwell. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Baker, F. & Rachlin, H. (2002) Teaching and learning in a probabilistic prisoner's dilemma. Behavioural Processes 57:211–26. [MS]10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00015-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargh, J. A. & Ferguson, M. J. (2000) Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin 126:925–45. [JIK]10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.925CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995) Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. MIT Press. [MA]10.7551/mitpress/4635.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, R. & Dunbar, R. (1997) Evolution of the social brain. In: Machiavellian intelligence II: Extensions and evaluations, ed. Whiten, A. & Byrne, R.. Cambridge University Press. [DJB]Google Scholar
Basu, K. (1990) On the non-existence of a rationality definition for extensive games. International Journal of Game Theory 19:33–44. [aAMC]10.1007/BF01753706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D. (1987) Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 20:65–122. [JL]10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60412-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. E., Raiffa, H. & Tversky, A. (1988) Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions in decision making. In: Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions, ed. Bell, D. E., Raiffa, H. & Tversky, A. Cambridge University Press. [arAMC]10.1017/CBO9780511598951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley, D. & Humphreys, P. (1982) Structuring decision problems and the “bias heuristic.” Acta Psychologica 50:201–52. [aAMC]10.1016/0001-6918(82)90042-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B. D. (1984) Rationalizable strategic behavior. Econometrica 52:1007–28. [arAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernoulli, D. (1738/1954) Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Comentarii Acdemii Scientarum Imperialis Petropolitanae 5:175–92. (English trans.: Sommer, L. (1954) Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica 22:23–36.) [AR]Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C. (1989) Self-refuting theories of strategic interaction: A paradox of common knowledge. Erkenntnis 30:69–85. [aAMC]10.1007/BF00184816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchieri, C. & Antonelli, G. A. (1995) Game-theoretic axioms for local rationality and bounded knowledge. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 4:145–67. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. (1987) Modeling rational players: Part 1. Economics and Philosophy 3:179–214. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. (1994a) Playing fair: Game theory and the social contract, vol. I. MIT Press. [arAMC]Google Scholar
Binmore, K. (1994b) Rationality in the Centipede. In: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference (TARK 1994), pp. 150–59, ed. Fagin, R. Morgan Kaufmann. [aAMC]10.1016/B978-1-4832-1453-5.50014-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K., Gale, J. & Samuelson, L. (1995) Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game. Games and Economic Behavior 8:56–90. [JPC]Google Scholar
Björnerstedt, J. & Weibull, J. (1996) Nash equilibrium and evolution by imitation. In: The rational foundations of economic behavior, ed. Arrow, K., Colombatto, E., Perlman, M. & Schmidt, E. Macmillan. [JPC]Google Scholar
Boesch, C. & Boesch, H. (1989) Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Tai National Park. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 78:547–73. [RS]10.1002/ajpa.1330780410CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonanno, G. (1991) The logic of rational play in games of perfect information. Economics and Philosophy 7:37–65. [aAMC]10.1017/S0266267100000900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowley, A. L. (1924) The mathematical groundwork of economics. Oxford University Press. [HH]Google Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1991) Culture and cooperation. In: Cooperation and prosocial behaviour, ed. Hinde, R. A. & Groebel, J. Cambridge University Press. [JL]Google Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1992) Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology 13:171–95. [PB]10.1016/0162-3095(92)90032-YCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1995) Why does culture increase human adaptability? Ethology and Sociobiology 16:125–43. [MA]10.1016/0162-3095(94)00073-GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1996) Why culture is common, but cultural evolution is rare. Proceedings of the British Academy 88:77–93. [MA]Google Scholar
Breiter, H. C., Aharon, I., Kahneman, D., Dale, A. & Shizgal, P. (2001) Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron 30(2):619–39. [GSB]10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00303-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewer, M. B. & Kramer, R. M. (1986) Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:543–49. [aAMC]10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. (1991) Rationality and the sure-thing principle. In: Thoughtful economic man, ed. Meeks, G. Cambridge University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Buunk, B. P. & Schaufeli, W. B. (1999) Reciprocity in interpersonal relationships: An evolutionary perspective on its importance for health and well-being. European Review of Social Psychology 10:259–91. [JL]10.1080/14792779943000080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (1999) A nonverbal theory of mind test: The performance of children and apes. Child Development 70:381–95. [SH]10.1111/1467-8624.00028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. F. (1995) Individual decision making. In: Handbook of experimental economics, ed. Kagel, J. H. & Roth, A. E. Princeton University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F. (1997) Progress in behavioral game theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11:167–88. [aAMC]10.1257/jep.11.4.167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. F. (1999) Behavioral economics: Reunifying psychology and economics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 96(10):575–77. [GSB]10.1073/pnas.96.19.10575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camerer, C. F. (2003) Behavioral game theory: Experiments on strategic interaction. Princeton University Press. [CFC]Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F. & Ho, T.-H. (1999) Experience-weighted attraction learning in games: A unifying approach. Econometrica 67:827–74. [WDC]10.1111/1468-0262.00054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. F., Ho, T.-H. & Chong, J. K. (2000) A cognitive hierarchy theory of one-shot games. (unpublished manuscript). http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~camerer/camerer.html [CFC]Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F. & Lovallo, D. (1999) Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. American Economic Review 89:306–18. [rAMC]10.1257/aer.89.1.306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. & Snowden, L., eds. (1985) Paradoxes of rationality and cooperation: Prisoner's dilemma and Newcomb's problem. University of British Columbia Press. [arAMC]10.59962/9780774857154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, D., Fantino, E. & Goodie, A. S. (1999) Base-rate training without case cues reduces base-rate neglect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6(2):319–27. [EF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casebeer, W. D. (2003) Natural ethical facts: Evolution, connectionism, and moral cognition. MIT Press. [WDC]10.7551/mitpress/4856.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casebeer, W. D. & Churchland, P. S. (2003) The neural mechanisms of moral cognition: A multiple-aspect approach to moral judgment and decisionmaking. Biology and Philosophy 18:169–94. [WDC]10.1023/A:1023380907603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, B. G. (1997) The inequity of inequality: Egalitarian instincts and evolutionary psychology. Journal of Health Psychology 2(3):413–25. [JL]10.1177/135910539700200309CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, I. D. (1980) Cooperative and noncooperative behaviour. American Naturalist 115:827–57. [RS]10.1086/283603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D. & Seyfarth, R. (1990) How monkeys see the world: Inside the mind of another species. University of Chicago Press. [MA]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, K., Pena, J., Porter, M. A. & Irwin, J. D. (2002) Self-control in honeybees. Psychonomic Bulletin Review 9:259–63. [rAMC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N. (1999) Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance. Cognitive Science 23:157–205. [rAMC]10.1207/s15516709cog2302_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Schaller, M., Houlihan, D., Arps, K., Fultz, J. & Beaman, A. L. (1987) Empathy-based helping: Is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(4):749–58. [JL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, L. J. (1981) Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:317–70. [aAMC]10.1017/S0140525X00009092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, A. A., Colman, A. M. & Thomas, R. M. (1990) Cooperation without awareness: A multiperson generalization of the minimal social situation. Behavioral Science 35:115–121. [aAMC]10.1002/bs.3830350204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. & Fararo, T. J. (1992) Rational choice theory: Advocacy and critique. Sage. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Colman, A. M. (1995a) Game theory and its applications in the social and biological sciences, 2nd edition. Butterworth-Heinemann. [arAMC]Google Scholar
Colman, A. M. (1995b) Prisoner's Dilemma, chicken, and mixed-strategy evolutionary equilibria. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18:550–51. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colman, A. M. (1997) Salience and focusing in pure coordination games. Journal of Economic Methodology 4:61–81. [aAMC]10.1080/13501789700000004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colman, A. M. (1998) Rationality assumptions of game theory and the backward induction paradox. In: Rational models of cognition, ed. Oaksford, M. & Chater, N. Oxford University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Colman, A. M. (2003) Depth of strategic reasoning in games. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7:2–4. [rAMC]10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00006-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colman, A. M. & Bacharach, M. (1997) Payoff dominance and the Stackelberg heuristic. Theory and Decision 43:1–19. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colman, A. M. & Stirk, J. A. (1998) Stackelberg reasoning in mixed-motive games: An experimental investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology 19:279–93. [aAMC, HG, JIK]10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00008-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colman, A. M., Stirk, J. & Park, J. (2001) Non-standard reasoning in games: Theory and experiments on Stackelberg reasoning. Paper presented at the V SAET Conference, Ischia, July 2–8, 2001. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Colman, A. M. & Wilson, J. C. (1997) Antisocial personality disorder: An evolutionary game theory analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology 2:23–34. [aAMC]10.1111/j.2044-8333.1997.tb00330.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. W., DeJong, D. V. & Forsythe, R. (1996) Cooperation without reputation: Experimental evidence from Prisoner's Dilemma games. Games and Economic Behavior 12:187–218. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. W., DeJong, D. V., Forsythe, R. & Ross, T. W. (1990) Selection criteria in coordination games: Some experimental results. American Economic Review 80:218–33. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Cooper, R. W., DeJong, D. V., Forsythe, R. & Ross, T. W. (1993) Forward induction in the Battle-of-the-Sexes game. American Economic Review 83:1303–13. [rAMC]Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1992) Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In: The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, ed. Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J.. Oxford University Press. [JL]Google Scholar
Crawford, V. P. & Haller, H. (1990) Learning how to cooperate: Optimal play in repeated coordination games. Econometrica 58:571–95. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cubitt, R. P. & Sugden, R. (1994) Rationally justifiable play and the theory of noncooperative games. Economic Journal 104:798–803. [aAMC]10.2307/2234975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cubitt, R. P. & Sugden, R. (1995) Games and decisions. Greek Economic Review 17:39–60. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1994) Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. Putnam. [DJB]Google Scholar
Dawes, R. M. (1973) The commons dilemma game: An n-person mixed-motive game with a dominating strategy for defection. Oregon Research Institute Research Bulletin 13:2. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Dawes, R. M. (1980) Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology 31:169–93. [aAMC]10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, R. M. (1988) Rational choice in an uncertain world. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. [arAMC]Google Scholar
Dawes, R. M. (2000) A theory of irrationality as a “reasonable” response to an incomplete identification. Synthese 122:133–63. [aAMC]10.1023/A:1005224211316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, R. M., van de Kragt, J. C. & Orbell, J. M. (1988) Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations; Experimental manipulations. Acta Psychologica 68:83–97. [aAMC]10.1016/0001-6918(88)90047-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawes, R. M., van de Kragt, J. C. & Orbell, J. M. (1990) Cooperation for the benefit of us: Not me, or my conscience. In: Beyond self-interest, ed. Mansbridge, J.. University of Chicago Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
DeBruine, L. M. (2002) Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:1307–12. [PJH]10.1098/rspb.2002.2034CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeBruine, L. M. (2002) (unpublished manuscript) Facial resemblance as a factor influencing outcomes in economic games. [PJH]Google Scholar
Dixit, A. K. & Nalebuff, B. J. (1991) Thinking strategically: The competitive edge in business, politics, and everyday life. Norton. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Doyle, J. R., O’Connor, D. J., Reynolds, G. M. & Bottomley, P. A. (1999) The robustness of the asymmetrically dominated effect: Buying frames, phantom alternatives, and in-store purchases. Psychology and Marketing 16:225–43. [aAMC]10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199905)16:3<225::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-X3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufwenberg, M. & Kirchsteiger, G. (1998) A theory of sequential reciprocity. Tilburg Center for Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 9837. [JPC]Google Scholar
Dugatkin, L. A. (1995) Partner choice, game theory and social behavior. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 5:3–14. [RS]Google Scholar
Dugatkin, L. A. (1997) Cooperation among animals: An evolutionary perspective. Oxford University Press. [JL, RS]10.1093/oso/9780195086218.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, C. C. & Wilson, R. K. (1998a) Reciprocal fairness and social signalling: Experiments with limited reputations. Paper presented at the American Economic Association Meeting, New York, NY, 1998. [PB, PJBH]Google Scholar
Eckel, C. C. & Wilson, R. K. (1998b) Reputation formation in simple bargaining games. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago, IL. [PJBH]Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881/1967) Mathematical psychics. Augustus M. Kelley/Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1881.) [arAMC]Google Scholar
Eells, E. (1985) Causality, decision, and Newcomb's paradox. In: Paradoxes of rationality and cooperation: Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's problem, ed. Campbell, R. & Sowden, L. University of British Columbia Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
El-Gamal, M. A., McKelvey, R. D. & Palfrey, T. R. (1993) A Bayesian sequential experimental study of learning in games. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88(422):428–35. [aAMC]10.1080/01621459.1993.10476292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsberg, D. (1961) Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axiom. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75:643–69. [KS]10.2307/1884324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1986) Introduction. In: Rational choice, ed. Elster, J. Basil Blackwell. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1989) Solomonic judgements: Studies in the limitations of rationality. Cambridge University Press. [rAMC]Google Scholar
Erev, I. & Roth, A. E. (1998) Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. American Economic Review 88:848–81. [WDC]Google Scholar
Fagin, R., Halpern, J. Y., Moses, Y. & Vardi, M. Y. (1995) Reasoning about knowledge. MIT Press. [aAMC]10.7551/mitpress/5803.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, A., Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. (2000) Testing theories of fairness – Intentions matter. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, Working Paper No. 63. [JPC]10.2139/ssrn.259263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, A. & Fischbacher, U. (2000) A theory of reciprocity. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, Working Paper No. 6. [JPC]Google Scholar
Fantino, E. (1998a) Behavior analysis and decision making. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 69:355–64. [EF]10.1901/jeab.1998.69-355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantino, E. (1998b) Judgment and decision making: Behavioral approaches. The Behavior Analyst 21:203–18. [EF]10.1007/BF03391964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantino, E. & Stolarz-Fantino, S. (2002a) From patterns to prosperity: A review of Rachlin's The Science of Self-Control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 78:117–25. [EF]10.1901/jeab.2002.78-117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantino, E. & Stolarz-Fantino, S. (2002b) The role of negative reinforcement; or: Is there an altruist in the house? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25(2):257–58. [EF]10.1017/S0140525X02290056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. (1987) Cheap talk, coordination, and entry. Rand Journal of Economics 18:34–39. [aAMC]10.2307/2555533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. (1988) Communication, coordination and Nash equilibrium. Economics Letters 27:209–14. [aAMC]10.1016/0165-1765(88)90172-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feger, H. (1991) Cooperation between groups. In: Cooperation and prosocial behaviour, ed. Hinde, R. A. & Groebel, J. Cambridge University Press. [JL]Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 90:980–94. [PB, KS]10.1257/aer.90.4.980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–40. [rAMC]10.1038/415137aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. (1999) A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114:817–68. [KS]10.1162/003355399556151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fey, M., McKelvey, R. D. & Palfrey, T. R. (1996) An experimental study of constant-sum Centipede games. International Journal of Game Theory 25:269–87. [aAMC, WDC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1988) Normative theories of decision making under risk and under uncertainty. In: Decision making: Descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions, ed. Bell, D. E., Raiffa, H., & Tversky, A. Cambridge University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Flood, M. M. (1954) Environmental non-stationarity in a sequential decisionmaking experiment. In: Decision processes, ed. Thrall, R. M., Coombs, C. H. & Davis, R. L.. Wiley. [MJ]Google Scholar
Foddy, M., Smithson, M., Schneider, S. & Hogg, M. eds. (1999) Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamic, structural, and intergroup aspects. Psychology Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Føllesdal, D. (1982) The status of rationality assumptions in interpretation and in the explanation of action. Dialectica 36:301–16. [rAMC]10.1111/j.1746-8361.1982.tb01545.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J., Savin, N. & Sefton, M. (1994) Replicability, fairness and play in experiments with simple bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior 6:347–69. [RS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, R. H. (1988) Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. W. W. Norton. [WDC, JL, RS]Google Scholar
Frank, R. H., Gilovitch, T. & Regan, D. (1993) The evolution of one-shot cooperation: An experiment. Ethology and Sociobiology 14:247–56. [PB]10.1016/0162-3095(93)90020-ICrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. (1911) Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning. In: The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 12, ed. and trans. Strachey, J.. Hogarth Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Friedman, J. W. (1991) Game theory with applications to economics, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Friedman, J. W., ed. (1996) The rational choice controversy: Economic models of politics reconsidered. Yale University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Frisch, D. & Clemen, R. T. (1994) Beyond expected utility: Rethinking behavioral decision research. Psychological Bulletin 116:46–54. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, W. R. (1954) Context effects and the validity of loudness scales. Journal of Experimental Psychology 48:218–24. [IV]10.1037/h0061514CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gauthier, D. (1975) Coordination. Dialogue 14:195–221. [aAMC, MCJ]10.1017/S0012217300043365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geanakoplos, J., Pearce, D. & Stacchetti, E. (1989) Psychological games and sequential rationality. Games and Economic Behavior 1:60–79. [arAMC, JPC]10.1016/0899-8256(89)90005-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. & Kokinov, B., eds. (2001) The analogical mind. MIT Press. [BK]10.7551/mitpress/1251.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. (1992) Weakly self-ratifying strategies: Comments on McClennen. Philosophical Studies 65:217–25. [PW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D. G. (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 103:650–69. [aAMC]10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M. & the ABC Research Group (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (1987) Modelling collective belief. Synthese 73:185–204. [aAMC]10.1007/BF00485446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. (1989a) Folk psychology takes sociality seriously. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:707–708. [aAMC]10.1017/S0140525X00025383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. (1989b) Rationality and salience. Philosophical Studies 57:61–77. [arAMC]10.1007/BF00355662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. (1990) Rationality, coordination and convention. Synthese 84:1–21. [aAMC]10.1007/BF00485004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, M. (2000) Collective preferences, obligations, and rational choice. Economics and Philosophy 17:109–19. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, D. B. (1953) Some theorems on n-person games. Princeton University. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) [aAMC]Google Scholar
Gintis, H. (2000) Game theory evolving: A problem-centered introduction to modeling strategic behavior. Princeton University Press. [PB, HG, KS]Google Scholar
Gintis, H. (2003) Solving the puzzle of human prosociality. Rationality and Society 15(2):155–87. [HG]10.1177/1043463103015002001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glimcher, P. W. (2002) Decisions, decisions, decisions: Choosing a biological science of choice. Neuron 36:323–32. [GSB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, J. I. & Shadlen, M. N. (2001) Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(1):10–16. [GSB]10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01567-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goltz, S. M. (1993) Examining the joint roles of responsibility and reinforcement history in recommitment. Decision Sciences 24:977–94. [EF]10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb00499.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goltz, S. M. (1999) Can't stop on a dime: The roles of matching and momentum in persistence of commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 19:37–63. [EF]10.1300/J075v19n01_05CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, D. A. (1991) Cooperation in a microcosm: Lessons from laboratory games. In: Cooperation and prosocial behavior, ed. Hinde, R. A. & Groebel, J.. Cambridge University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Goodie, A. S. & Fantino, E. (1995) An experientially derived base-rate error in humans. Psychological Science 6:101–106. [EF]10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00314.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodie, A. S. & Fantino, E. (1996) Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error. Nature 380:247–49. [EF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodie, A. S. & Fantino, E. (1999) What does and does not alleviate base-rate neglect under direct experience. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12:307–35. [EF]10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199912)12:4<307::AID-BDM324>3.0.CO;2-H3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goyal, S. & Janssen, M. (1996) Can we rationally learn to coordinate? Theory and Decision 40:29–49. [HH]10.1007/BF00133159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. P. & Shapiro, I. (1994) Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. Yale University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Grzelak, J. (1988) Conflict and cooperation. In: Introduction to social psychology: A European perspective, ed. Hewstone, M., Stroebe, W., Codol, J.-P. & Stephenson, G. M. Basil Blackwell. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Güth, W. (1995) On ultimatum bargaining experiments – A personal review. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27:329–44. [MP]10.1016/0167-2681(94)00071-LCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güth, W., Ockenfels, P. & Wendel, M. (1997) Cooperation based on trust: An experimental investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology 18:15–43. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halford, G. S. (1993) Children's understanding: The development of mental models. Erlbaum. [BK]Google Scholar
Haller, H. (2000) Non-additive beliefs in solvable games. Theory and Decision 49:313–38. [HH]10.1023/A:1026549117322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamburger, H. (1973) N-person Prisoner's Dilemma. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 3:27–48. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1–52. [DJB, rAMC, PJBH]10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, P. J. B. & Ross, K. (2002) What's a pretty face worth? (II): Factors affecting offer levels in the dictator game. Paper presented at the Human Behavior and Evolution Society Meeting, New Brunswick, NJ. [PJBH]Google Scholar
Harless, D. W. & Camerer, C. F. (1994) The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica 62:1251–89. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, W. (1991) Ratifiability and refinements. In: Foundations of decision theory, ed. Bacharach, M. & S. Hurley, S.. Blackwell. [PW]Google Scholar
Harper, W. (1999) Solutions based on ratifiability and sure thing reasoning. In: The logic of strategy, ed. Bicchieri, C., Jeffrey, R. & Skyrms, B. Oxford University Press. [PW]Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. (1962) Rational postulates for bargaining solutions in cooperative and non-cooperative games. Management Science 9:197–219. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. (1966) A general theory of rational behavior in game situations. Econometrica 34:613–34. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. (1967–1968) Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, Parts I-III. Management Science. 14:159–82, 320–34, 486–502. [aAMC]10.1287/mnsc.14.3.159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C. & Selten, R. (1988) A general theory of equilibrium selection in games. MIT Press. [arAMC, HH]Google Scholar
Hartl, J. A. & Fantino, E. (1996) Choice as a function of reinforcement ratios in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 66:11–27. [EF]10.1901/jeab.1996.66-11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausman, D. (1992) The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge University Press. [DMH]10.1017/CBO9780511752032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedden, T. & Zhang, J. (2002) What do you think I think you think? Strategic reasoning in matrix games. Cognition 85:1–36. [rAMC, MJ]10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00054-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, F. (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley. [rAMC]10.1037/10628-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. & McElreath, R. (2001) In search of Homo economicus: Behavioral experiments from 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review 91:73–78. [PB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J. (1990) Rational choice theory. American Psychologist 45:356–67. [aAMC]10.1037/0003-066X.45.3.356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hey, J. D. & Orme, C. (1994) Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica 62:1291–1326. [aAMC]10.2307/2951750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. & Dickinson, A. (1993) The intentionality of animal action. In: Consciousness, ed. Davies, M. & Humphreys, G. Blackwell. [SH]Google Scholar
Hill, K. (2002) Altruistic cooperation during foraging by the Ache, and the evolved predisposition to cooperate. Human Nature 13:105–28. [MA]10.1007/s12110-002-1016-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinde, R. A. (1987) Individuals, relationships and culture: Links between ethology and the social sciences. Cambridge University Press. [JL]Google Scholar
Hofbauer, J. & Sigmund, K. (1998) Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge University Press. [arAMC, KS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, D. R. (1983) Metamagical themas: Computer tournaments of the Prisoner's Dilemma suggest how cooperation evolves. Scientific American 248(5):14–20. [aAMC]10.1038/scientificamerican0483-14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, J. H. (1996) The rationality of adaptive agents. In: The rational foundations of economic behaviour: Proceedings of the IEA Conference, Turin, Italy, pp. 281–97, ed. Arrow, K. J., Colombatto, E., Perlman, M., & Schmidt, C. Macmillan. [rAMC]Google Scholar
Hollis, M. & Sugden, R. (1993) Rationality in action. Mind 102:1–35. [DJB, aAMC]10.1093/mind/102.405.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T. (1981) Counterfactuals and Newcomb's problem. Journal of Philosophy 78:331–56. [aAMC]10.2307/2026128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, A. I. & McNamara, J. M. (1989) The value of food – Effects of open and closed economies. Animal Behaviour 37:546–62. [MS]10.1016/0003-3472(89)90034-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, A. I. & McNamara, J. M. (1999) Models of adaptive behaviour: An approach based on state. Cambridge University Press. [MS]Google Scholar
Howard, J. (1988) Cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma. Theory and Decision 24:203–13. [SH]10.1007/BF00148954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J., Payne, J. W. & Puto, C. (1982) Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research 9:90–98. [aAMC]10.1086/208899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1739–40/1978) A treatise of human nature, 2nd edition, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739–1740.) [aAMC, AR]Google Scholar
Hurley, S. (1991) Newcomb's problem, prisoners’ dilemma, and collective action. Synthese 86:173–96. [SH]10.1007/BF00485806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, S. (1994) A new take from Nozick on Newcomb's problem and prisoners’ dilemma. Analysis 54:65–72. [SH]10.1093/analys/54.2.65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, S. (2003) Animal action in the space of reasons. Mind and Language 18(3):231–56). [SH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press. [SH]10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, M. C. W. (2001a) On the principle of coordination. Economics and Philosophy 17:221–34. [MCWJ]10.1017/S0266267101000244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, M. C. W. (2001b) Rationalizing focal points. Theory and Decision 50:119–48. [aAMC, HH, MCWJ]10.1023/A:1010349014718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, R. (1983) The logic of decision, 2nd edition. Chicago University Press. [aAMC, PW]Google Scholar
Joergensen, P. R. & Hancock, P. J. B. (2001) What's a pretty face worth?: Factors affecting offer levels in the ultimatum game. Paper presented at the Human Behavior and Evolution Society Meeting, London. [PJBH]Google Scholar
Jones, M. & Seick, W. R. (in press) Learning myopia: An adaptive recency effect in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. [MJ]Google Scholar
Joyce, J. M. (1999) The foundations of causal decision theory. Cambridge University Press. [AR, PW]10.1017/CBO9780511498497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagel, J. H. & Roth, A. E. eds. (1995) Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press. [aAMC]10.1515/9780691213255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A., eds. (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press. [arAMC]10.1017/CBO9780511809477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review 80:237–51. [EF]10.1037/h0034747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–91. [rAMC, KS]10.2307/1914185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A., ed. (2000) Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge University Press. [rAMC]10.1017/CBO9780511803475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, H. & Hill, K. (1985) Food sharing among Ache foragers. Tests of explanatory hypotheses. Current Anthropology 26:223–45. [JL]10.1086/203251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavka, G. (1983) The toxin puzzle. Analysis 43:33–36. [RMS]10.1093/analys/43.1.33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. W., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E. & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003) An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge University Press. [PAMVL]Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. & Stahelski, A. J. (1970) Social interaction basis of cooperators’ and competitors’ beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16:66–91. [PAMVL]10.1037/h0029849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, H. H. & Thibaut, J. W. (1978) Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Wiley. [PAMVL]Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Thibaut, J. W., Radloff, R. & Mundy, D. (1962) The development of cooperation in the “minimal social situation.” Psychological Monographs 76 (Whole No. 19). [rAMC]10.1037/h0093819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, R. L. (1995) The foraging spectrum: Diversity in hunter-gatherer lifeways. Smithsonian Institution Press. [JL]Google Scholar
Kerr, B., Riley, M. A., Feldman, M. W. & Bohannan, B. J. M. (2002) Local dispersion promotes biodiversity in a real game of rock-paper-scissors. Nature 418:171–74. [KS]10.1038/nature00823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koehler, J. J. (1996) The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19(1):1–53. [EF]10.1017/S0140525X00041157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L., ed. (1984) The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. Harper & Row. [JL]Google Scholar
Kokinov, B. (1992) Inference evaluation in deductive, inductive and analogical reasoning. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 903–908. Erlbaum. [BK]Google Scholar
Kokinov, B. & Petrov, A. (2001) Integration of memory and reasoning in analogy-making: The AMBR model. In: The analogical mind, ed. Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. & Kokinov, B. MIT Press. [BK]Google Scholar
Kraines, D. & Kraines, V. (1995) Evolution of learning among Pavlov strategies in a competitive environment with noise. Journal of Conflict Resolution 39:439–66. [arAMC]10.1177/0022002795039003003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramarz, F. (1996) Dynamic focal points in N-person coordination games. Theory and Decision 40:277–313. [HH]10.1007/BF00134211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R. M. & Tyler, T. R. (1996) Trust in organisations: Frontiers of theory and research. Sage. [JL]10.4135/9781452243610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B. (1987) An introduction to behavioural ecology, 2nd edition. Basil Blackwell. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Kreps, D. (1990) A course in microeconomic theory. Princeton University Press. [aAMC]10.1515/9780691215747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, D. M. & Wilson, R. (1982a) Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory 27:253–79. [aAMC]10.1016/0022-0531(82)90030-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreps, D. M. & Wilson, R. (1982b) Sequential equilibria. Econometrica 50:863–94. [rAMC]10.2307/1912767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, J. (1998) On the perception of social consensus. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 30:163–240. [JIK]10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60384-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyburg, H. E. Jr., (1987) Bayesian and non-Bayesian evidential updating. Artificial Intelligence 31:271–93. [rAMC]10.1016/0004-3702(87)90068-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laming, D. R. J. (1997) The measurement of sensation. Oxford University Press. [IV]10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198523420.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, J. (1995) Behavioural ecology and evolution. In: Biological aspects of behavior, ed. Kimble, D. & Colman, A. M. Longman. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Lazarus, J. & Inglis, I. R. (1986) Shared and unshared parental investment, parentoffspring conflict and brood size. Animal Behaviour 34:1791–1804. [JL]10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80265-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, S. E. G., Tarpy, R. M. & Webley, P. (1987) The individual in the economy. Cambridge University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Ledyard, J. O. (1995) Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In: Handbook of experimental economics, ed. Kagel, J. H. & Roth, A. E. Princeton University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. (1969) Convention: A philosophical study. Harvard University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. (1979) Prisoner's dilemma is a Newcomb problem. Philosophy and Public Affairs 8:235–40. [rAMC, JIK]Google Scholar
Lockhead, G. (1995) Psychophysical scaling methods reveal and measure context effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 18(3):607–12. [IV]10.1017/S0140525X00040097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, G., Weber, E., Hsee, C. & Welch, N. (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin 127:267–86. [DJB]10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logue, A. W. (1988) Research on self-control: An integrating framework. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:665–709. [EF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. D. & Raiffa, H. (1957) Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. Wiley/Dover. [aAMC, WDC, AR, RS]Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. & von Winterfeldt, D. (1994) What common ground exists for descriptive, prescriptive, and normative utility theories? Management Science 40:263–79. [AR]10.1287/mnsc.40.2.263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, M. (1973) The Cyprus conflict as a Prisoner's Dilemma Game. Journal of Conflict Resolution 17:7–32. [aAMC]10.1177/002200277301700102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machina, M. (1987) Choice under uncertainty: Problems solved and unsolved. Economic Perspectives 1:121–54. [aAMC]10.1257/jep.1.1.121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machina, M. (1991) Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility. In: Foundations of decision theory, ed. Bacharach, M. & Hurley, S.. Blackwell. [arAMC]Google Scholar
Manktelow, K. I. & Over, D. E. (1993) Introduction: The study of rationality. In: Rationality: Psychological and philosophical perspectives, ed. Manktelow, K. I. & Over, D. E. Routledge. [arAMC]Google Scholar
Margolis, H. (1982) Selfishness, altruism, and rationality: A theory of social choice. Cambridge University Press. [JL]Google Scholar
Markman, A. & Moreau, C. (2001) Analogy and analogical comparison in choice. In: The analogical mind, ed. Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. & Kokinov, B. MIT Press. [BK]Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1976) Evolution and the theory of games. American Scientist 64(1):41–45. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1984) Game theory and the evolution of behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7:95–101. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. & Price, G. R. (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246:15–18. [aAMC]10.1038/246015a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V. & Trouard, T. (2001) A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98(20):11832–35. [GSB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClennen, E. F. (1983) Sure-thing doubts. In: Foundations of utility and risk theory with applications, ed. Stigum, B. F. & Wenstøp, F. Reidel. [aAMC]Google Scholar
McClennen, E. F. (1985) Prisoner's dilemma and resolute choice. In: Paradoxes of rationality and cooperation: Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's problem, ed. Campbell, R. & Sowden, L. University of British Columbia Press. [rAMC]Google Scholar
McClennen, E. F. (1990) Rationality and dynamic choice. Cambridge University Press. [arAMC]10.1017/CBO9780511983979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClennen, E. F. (1992) The theory of rationality for ideal games. Philosophical Studies 65:193–215. [aAMC, PW]10.1007/BF00571324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClintock, C. G. & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1988) The role of interdependent structure, individual value orientation, and another's strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55:396–409. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElreath, R., Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. (in press) Shared norms can lead to the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology 44:122–29. [MA]10.1086/345689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKelvey, R. D. & Palfrey, T. R. (1992) An experimental study of the Centipede game. Econometrica 60:803–36. [WDC, aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, J. M. (1996) Risk-prone behaviour under rules which have evolved in a changing environment. American Zoologist 36:484–95. [MS]10.1093/icb/36.4.484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, J., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1994a) Focal points in pure coordination games: An experimental investigation. Theory and Decision 36:163–85. [aAMC, MCJ]10.1007/BF01079211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, J., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (1994b) The nature of salience: An experimental investigation in pure coordination games. American Economic Review 84:658–73. [aAMC, MCWJ]Google Scholar
Mesterton-Gibbons, M. & Dugatkin, L. A. (1992) Cooperation among unrelated individuals: Evolutionary factors. The Quarterly Review of Biology 67:267–81. [RS]10.1086/417658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P. (1981) An axiomatic characterization of common knowledge. Econometrica 49:219–22. [aAMC]10.2307/1911137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P. & Roberts, J. (1982) Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence. Journal of Economic Theory 27:280–312. [aAMC]10.1016/0022-0531(82)90031-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milinski, M., Semmann, D. & Krambeck, H.-J. (2002) Reputation helps solve the “tragedy of the commons.” Nature 415:424–26. [JL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. & Isard, S. (1964) Free recall of self-embedded English sentences. Information and Control 7:293–303. [rAMC]10.1016/S0019-9958(64)90310-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monderer, D. & Samet, D. (1989) Approximating common knowledge with common beliefs. Games and Economic Behavior 1:170–90. [aAMC]10.1016/0899-8256(89)90017-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montague, P. R. & Berns, G. S. (2002) Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation. Neuron 36:265–84. [GSB]10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00974-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montague, P. R., Berns, G. S., Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., Pagnoni, G., Dhamala, M., Wiest, M. C., Karpov, I., King, R. D., Apple, N. & Fisher, R. E. (2002) Hyperscanning: Simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions. NeuroImage 16:1159–64. [GSB]10.1006/nimg.2002.1150CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monterosso, J., Ainslie, G., Mullen, P. & Gault, B. (2002) The fragility of cooperation: An empirical study employing false-feedback in a sequential iterated prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Economic Psychology 23:437–48. [JM]10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00095-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, P. K., ed. (1990) Rationality in action: Contemporary approaches. Cambridge University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Nash, J. F. (1950a) Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 36:48–49. [aAMC]10.1073/pnas.36.1.48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. F. (1950b) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155–62. [aAMC]10.2307/1907266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. F. (1951) Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics 54:286–95. [arAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. F. (1953) Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica 21:128–40. [aAMC]10.2307/1906951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. F. (2002) Non-cooperative games. In: The essential John Nash, ed. Kuhn, H. W. & Nasar, S. Princeton University Press. [rAMC]10.1515/9781400884087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noë, R. (1990) A veto game played by baboons: A challenge to the use of the Prisoner's Dilemma as a paradigm for reciprocity and cooperation. Animal Behaviour 39:78–90. [RS]10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80728-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M. A., May, R. M. & Sigmund, K. (1995) The arithmetics of mutual help. Scientific American 1995(6):76–81. [aAMC]10.1038/scientificamerican0695-76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Page, K. M. & Sigmund, K. (2000) Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science 289:1773–75. [PB, KS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. (1993) A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game. Nature 364:56–58. [aAMC]10.1038/364056a0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nozick, R. (1969) Newcomb's problem and two principles of choice. In:Essays in honor of Carl G. Hempel: A tribute on his sixty-fifth birthday, ed. Rescher, N. Reidel. [aAMC, RMS]Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1993) The nature of rationality. Princeton University Press. [arAMC]10.1515/9781400820832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oaksford, M. & Chater, N. (1996) Rational explanation of the selection task. Psychological Review 103:381–91. [MJ]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ordeshook, P. C. (1986) Game theory and political theory: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. [aAMC]10.1017/CBO9780511666742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. [JL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, C., Scheel, D. & Pusey, A. E. (1990) Why lions form groups: Food is not enough. American Naturalist 136:1–19. [RS]10.1086/285079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, K. M. & Nowak, M. A. (2002) Empathy leads to fairness. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 64:1101–16. [KS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, K. M., Nowak, M. & Sigmund, K. (2002) The spatial ultimatum game. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) B 267:2177–82. [KS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palameta, B. & Brown, W. M. (1999) Human cooperation is more than by-product mutualism. Animal Behaviour 57:F1-F3. [RS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parco, J. E., Rapoport, A. & Stein, W. E. (2002) The effects of financial incentives on the breakdown of mutual trust. Psychological Science 13:292–97. [WDC, rAMC]10.1111/1467-9280.00454CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parfit, D. (1979) Is common-sense morality self-defeating? Journal of Philosophy 76:533–45. [arAMC]10.2307/2025548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J. R. & Colman, A. M. (2001) Team reasoning: An experimental investigation. Paper presented at the Fifth Conference of the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory, Ischia, 2–8 July, 2001. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Pearce, D. G. (1984) Rationalizable strategic behavior and the problem of perfection. Econometrica 52:1029–50. [arAMC]10.2307/1911197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, I. D. & Pierce, J. W. (1999) Computer graphic studies of the role of facial similarity in judgements of attractiveness. Current Psychology 18:104–17. [PJH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. & Sugden, R. (1989) The backward induction paradox. Journal of Philosophy 86:169–82. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinelli, D. (1996) Chimpanzee theory of mind? In: Theories of theories of mind, ed. Carruthers, P. & Smith, P. K. Cambridge University Press. [SH]Google Scholar
Price, M., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2002) Punitive sentiment as an anti-free rider psychological device. Evolution and Human Behavior 23:203–31. [DJB, rAMC]10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00093-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, D. G. & Kimmel, M. J. (1977) Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology 28:363–92. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quattrone, G. A. & Tversky, A. (1984) Causal versus diagnostic contingencies: On self-deception and the voter's illusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46:237–248. [aAMC]10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1962) Paradox. Scientific American 206(4):84–96. [rAMC]10.1038/scientificamerican0462-84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabbie, J. M. (1991) Determinants of instrumental intra-group cooperation. In: Cooperation and prosocial behaviour, ed. Hinde, R. A. & Groebel, J. Cambridge University Press. [JL]Google Scholar
Rabin, M. (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review 83:1281–1302. [arAMC, JPC]Google Scholar
Rachlin, H. (2002) Altruism and selfishness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25(2):239–50. [EF, JIK]10.1017/S0140525X02000055CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rachlin, H. & Green, L. (1972) Commitment, choice and self-control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 17:15–22. [rAMC]10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raiffa, H. (1992) Game theory at the University of Michigan, 1948–1952. In: Toward a history of game theory, ed. Weintraub, E. R. Duke University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1931) Truth and probability. In: The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays, ed. Braithwaite, R. B.. Routledge and Kegan Paul. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Rapoport, A. (1962) The use and misuse of game theory. Scientific American 207(6):108–18. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rapoport, A. (1988) Experiments with n-person social traps I. Prisoner's dilemma, weak prisoner's dilemma, volunteer's dilemma and largest number. Journal of Conflict Resolution 32:457–72. [AR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, A. (1989) Decision theory and decision behavior: Normative and descriptive approaches. Kluwer. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, A. & Chammah, A. M. (1965) Prisoner's Dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation. University of Michigan Press. [arAMC, IV]10.3998/mpub.20269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, A., Seale, D. A. & Parco, J. E. (2002) Coordination in the aggregate without common knowledge or outcome information. In: Experimental business research, ed. Zwick, R. & Rapoport, A. Kluwer. [WDC]Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999) A theory of justice, revised edition. Oxford University Press. [JL]10.4159/9780674042582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. (2000) Engaging reason: On the theory of value and action. Oxford University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Regan, D. (1980) Utilitarianism and co-operation. Clarendon. [rAMC, SH]10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198246091.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, N. (1975) Unselfishness: The role of the vicarious affects in moral philosophy and social theory. University of Pittsburgh Press. [rAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, P. & Boyd, R. (2001) Built for speed, not for comfort: Darwinian theory and human culture. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 23:423–63. [MA]Google Scholar
Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S. & Kilts, C. D. (2002) A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron 35:1–20. [GSB]10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00755-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G. & Kilts, C. D. (2002) A neural basis for cooperation. Neuron 35:395–405. [DJB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, T. W. & Everitt, B. J. (1992) Functions of dopamine in the dorsal and ventral striatum. Seminars in Neuroscience 4:119–27. [GSB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, G. (1997) Testing mutualism: A commentary on Clements & Stephens. Animal Behaviour 53:1361–62.10.1006/anbe.1996.0378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, G. & Sherratt, T. N. (1998) Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment. Nature 394:175–79. [JL]10.1038/28160CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, R. W. (1981) Games of perfect information, predatory pricing and the chain-store paradox. Journal of Economic Theory 25:92–100. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. E. (1995) Bargaining experiments. In: Handbook of experimental economics, ed. Kagel, J. H. & Roth, A. E. Princeton University Press. [PB]Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E. & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003) Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology 54:351–75. [PAMVL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samet, D. (1996) Hypothetical knowledge and games with perfect information. Games and Economic Behavior 17:230–51. [aAMC]10.1006/game.1996.0104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, L. (1992) Dominated strategies and common knowledge. Games and Economic Behavior 4:284–313. [aAMC]10.1016/0899-8256(92)90020-SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, L. J. (1951) The theory of statistical decision. Journal of the American statistics Association 46:55–67. [aAMC]10.1080/01621459.1951.10500768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, L. J. (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley. (2nd edition, 1972.) [aAMC]Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L. (1999) The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist 54(3):182–203. [MJ]10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.182CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scharlemann, J. P., Eckel, C. C., Kacelnik, A. & Wilson, R. K. (2001) The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face. Journal of Economic Psychology 22:617–40. [PJBH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, T. C. (1960) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press. [aAMC, MCWJ]Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. (1973) Hockey helmets, concealed weapons, and daylight saving: A study of binary choices with externalities. Journal of Conflict Resolution 17:381–428. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillo, M., Funk, P. & Rovatsos, M. (2000) Using trust for detecting deceitful agents in artificial societies. Applied Artificial Intelligence 14:825–48. [JL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, D. A. (1995) Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups. Praeger. [aAMC]10.5040/9798216986607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, W., Dayan, P. & Montague, P. R. (1997) A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275:1593–99. [GSB]10.1126/science.275.5306.1593CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuster, R. (2001) An animal model of cooperating dyads: Methodological and theoretical issues. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis 27:165–200. [RS]Google Scholar
Schuster, R. (2002) Cooperative coordination as a social behavior: Experiments with an animal model. Human Nature 13:47–83. [RS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuster, R., Berger, B. D. & Swanson, H. H. (1993) Cooperative social coordination and aggression. II. Effects of sex and housing among three strains of intact laboratory rats differing in aggressiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 46B:367–90. [RS]Google Scholar
Selten, R. (1965) Spieltheoretische behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfrageträgheit. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 121:301–24, 667–89. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Selten, R. (1975) Re-examination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. International Journal of Game Theory 4:25–55. [aAMC]10.1007/BF01766400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selten, R. (1978) The chain store paradox. Theory and Decision 9:127–59. [aAMC, AR]10.1007/BF00131770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selten, R. & Stoecker, R. (1986) End behavior in sequences of finite Prisoner's Dilemma supergames: A learning theory approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 7:47–70. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1978) Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. In: Scientific models and men, ed. Harris, H. Oxford University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1985) Rationality and uncertainty. Theory and Decision 18:109–27. [rAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethi, R. & Somanathan, E. (2003) Understanding reciprocity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 50:27. [DJB]10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00032-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafir, E. (1993) Intuitions about rationality and cognition. In: Rationality: Psychological and philosophical perspectives, ed. Manktelow, K. I. & Over, D. E. Routledge. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Shin, H. (1991) Two notions of ratifiability and equilibrium in games. In: Foundations of decision theory, ed. Bacharach, M. & Hurley, S. Blackwell. [PW]Google Scholar
Sinervo, B. & Lively, C. M. (1996) The rock-scissors-paper game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. Nature 340:240–43. [KS]10.1038/380240a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P. & Lichtenstein, S. (1983) Preference reversals: A broader perspective. American Economic Review 73:596–605. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1910) The wealth of nations. Dutton. (Original work published 1776). [aAMC]Google Scholar
Snow, P. (1994) Ignorance and the expressiveness of single- and set-valued probability models of belief. In: Uncertainty in artificial intelligence: Proceedings of the Tenth Conference (UAI-1994), pp. 531–37, ed. de Mantras, R. L. & Poole, D. L. Morgan Kaufmann. [rAMC]Google Scholar
Sober, E. & Wilson, D. S. (1998) Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press. [RS]Google Scholar
Solnick, S. J. & Schweitzer, M. E. (1999) The influence of physical attractiveness and gender on ultimatum game decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 793:199–215. [PJH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. & Galloway, D. (2000) Man the rational animal? Synthese 122:165–78. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spohn, W. (2001) Dependency equilibria and the causal structure of decision and game situations. Forschungsberichte der DFG-Forschergruppe; Logik in der Philosophie 56:645. Also to appear in: Homo Oeconomicus (2003). [rAMC, RMS]Google Scholar
Squires, D. (1998) Impossibility theorems for normal form games. Theory and Decision 44:67–81. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staddon, J. E. R. (1983) Adaptive behavior and learning. Cambridge University Press. [RS]Google Scholar
Stahl, D. O. & Wilson, P. W. (1995) On players’ models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior 10:218–54. [arAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stander, P. E. (1992) Cooperative hunting in lions: The role of the individual. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29:445–54. [RS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. & West, R. F. (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:645–726. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starmer, C. (2000) Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature 38:332–82. [DJB, aAMC]10.1257/jel.38.2.332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, E. (1996) Without good reason: The rationality debate in philosophy and cognitive science. Oxford University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Stewart, et al. (in press) Prospect relativity: How choice options influence decision under risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology. [IV]Google Scholar
Stolarz-Fantino, S. & Fantino, E. (1990) Cognition and behavior analysis: A review of Rachlin's Judgment, decision, and choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 54:317–22. [EF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stolarz-Fantino, S. & Fantino, E. (1995) The experimental analysis of reasoning: A review of Gilovich's How we know what isn't so. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 64:111–16. [EF]10.1901/jeab.1995.64-111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolarz-Fantino, S., Fantino, E. & Kulik, J. (1996) The conjunction fallacy: Differential incidence as a function of descriptive frames and educational context. Contemporary Educational Psychology 21:208–18. [EF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolarz-Fantino, S., Fantino, E., Zizzo, D. & Wen, J. (2003) The conjunction effect: New evidence for robustness. American Journal of Psychology 116(1):15–34. [EF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugden, R. (1991a) Rational bargaining. In: Foundations of decision theory, ed. Bacharach, M. & Hurley, S. Blackwell. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (1991b) Rational choice: A survey of contributions from economics and philosophy. Economic Journal 101:751–85. [aAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, R. (1992) Inductive reasoning in games. In: Rational interaction: Essays in honor of John C. Harsanyi, ed. Selten, R. Springer-Verlag. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (1993) Thinking as a team: Towards an explanation of nonselfish behavior. Social Philosophy and Policy 10:69–89. [aAMC]10.1017/S0265052500004027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, R. (1995) Towards a theory of focal points. Economic Journal 105:533–50. [aAMC, MCWJ]10.2307/2235016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, R. (2000) Team preferences. Economics and Philosophy 16:175–204. [aAMC, MCJ]10.1017/S0266267100000213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. (1996) When rationality fails. In: The rational choice controversy: Economic models of politics reconsidered, ed. Friedman, J.. Yale University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1988) The Ultimatum Game. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 24:195–206. [PJH, MP]10.1257/jep.2.4.195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (1992) The winner's curse: Paradoxes and anomalies of economic life. Princeton University Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Thomas, J. P. & McFadyen, R. G. (1995) The confidence heuristic: A gametheoretic analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology 16:97–113. [rAMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press. [MA]Google Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, ed. Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. Oxford University Press. [JL]Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46:35–57. [DJB, rAMC]10.1086/406755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. (1969) Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review 76:31–48. [aAMC]10.1037/h0026750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. (1996) Rational theory and constructive choice. In: The rational foundations of economic behaviour: Proceedings of the IEA Conference, Turin, Italy, pp. 185–97, ed. Arrow, K. J., Colombatto, E., Perlman, M. & Schmidt, C. Macmillan. [rAMC]Google Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5:297–323. [rAMC]10.1007/BF00122574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Doel, H. & van Velthoven, B. (1993) Democracy and welfare economics, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. [JL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Huyck, J., Battalio, R., & Beil, R. (1990) Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. American Economic Review 80:234–48. [MA, aAMC]Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999) The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77:337–49. [arAMC, PAV-L]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M. (2000) Beyond self-interest: A set of propositions relevant to interpersonal orientations. In: European review of social psychology, vol. 11, ed. Hewstone, M. & Stroebe, W. Wiley. [PAV-L]Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M. & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2001) Social interaction: Cooperation and competition. In: Introduction to social psychology, 3rd edition, ed. Hewstone, M. & Stroebe, W. Blackwell. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M. & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992) Social dilemmas: The state of the art. In: Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings, ed. Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M. & Wilke, . Pergamon. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E. M. N. & Joireman, J. A. (1997) Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73:733–46. [PAMVL]10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Vugt, M. (1998) The conflicts in modern society. The Psychologist 11:289–92. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Vlaev, I. & Chater, N (submitted) Game relativity: How context influences decisions under uncertainty. [IV]Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. (1928) Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele. Mathematische Annalen 100:295–320. [aAMC, AR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior, first edition. Wiley. [aAMC, WDC, AR]Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior, second edition. Princeton University Press (2nd edition, 1947; 3rd edition, 1953). [aAMC]Google Scholar
Wagstaff, G. (2001) Integrated psychological and philosophical approach to justice: Equity and desert. In: Problems in contemporary philosophy, vol. 50. Edwin Mellen. [JL]Google Scholar
Walley, P. (1991) Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities. Chapman & Hall. [rAMC]10.1007/978-1-4899-3472-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1922/1968) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. English edition, 1968: Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology, trans. Roth, G. & Wittich, G. Bedminster Press. [aAMC]Google Scholar
Weirich, P. (1988) Hierarchical maximization of two kinds of expected utility. Philosophy of Science 55:560–82. [PW]10.1086/289461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weirich, P. (1994) The hypothesis of Nash equilibrium and its Bayesian justification. In: Logic and philosophy of science in Uppsala, ed. Prawitz, D. & Westerståhl, D.. Kluwer [PW]Google Scholar
Weirich, P. (1998) Equilibrium and rationality: Game theory revised by decision rules. Cambridge University Press. [aAMC, PW]10.1017/CBO9780511663727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weirich, P. (2001) Decision space: Multidimensional utility analysis. Cambridge University Press. [PW]10.1017/CBO9780511498602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A. (1996) When does smart behaviour-reading become mindreading? In: Theories of theories of mind, ed. Carruthers, P. & Smith, P. K. Cambridge University Press. [SH]Google Scholar
Yeager, L. B. (2001) Ethics as a social science: The moral philosophy of social cooperation. Edward Elgar. [JL]Google Scholar
Young, H. P. (1993) The evolution of conventions. Econometrica 61(1):57–58. [HG]10.2307/2951778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zermelo, E. (1912) Über eine Anwendung der Mengenlehre auf die Theorie des Schachspiels. Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Mathematicians, Cambridge 2:501–10. [aAMC]Google Scholar
You have
Access
- 1
- Cited by