Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T11:53:43.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

biting the utilitarian bullet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2005

jonathan baron
Affiliation:
department of psychology, university of pennsylvania, philadelphia, pa 19104-6241 baron@psych.upenn.edu http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~baron
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

the heuristics-and-biases approach requires a clear separation of normative and descriptive models. normative models cannot be justified by intuition, or by consensus. the lack of consensus on normative theory is a problem for prescriptive approaches. one solution to the prescriptive problem is to argue contingently: if you are concerned about consequences, here is a way to make them better.

Information

Type
open peer commentary
Copyright
2005 cambridge university press