Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T10:30:55.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can mere phonemes be components of Millikan's substance concepts?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1998

Niko Scharer
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, M5S 1A1 nscharer@chass.utoronto.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In presenting her attractive theory of concepts, Millikan makes an unwarranted assumption about the role of language in concept acquisition. The phoneme string, rather than the “word” as a semantic entity, may suffice to play the crucial role in the acquisition of substance concepts. Hence Millikan may underestimate the degree of similarity between language and other media of perception.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press