Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T09:12:37.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative, continuity, and computational evidence in evolutionary theory: Predictive evidence versus productive evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2006

David M. W. Powers*
Affiliation:
School of Informatics and Engineering, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia http://www.infoeng.flinders.edu.au/people/pages/powers_david
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Of three types of evidence available to evolution theoristscomparative, continuity, and computationalthe first is largely productive rather than predictive. Although comparison between extant species or languages is possible and can be suggestive of evolutionary processes, leading to theory development, comparison with extinct species and languages seems necessary for validation. Continuity and computational evidence provide the best opportunities for supporting predictions.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006