Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T06:20:42.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compositional semanticsand the lemma dilemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

Marco Zorzi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Trieste, 34123 Trieste, Italy zorzi@univ.trieste.it www.psychol.cul.ac.uk/marco.zorzi/marco.html
Gabriella Vigliocco
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706 gviglioc@facstaff.wisc.edu psych.wisc.edu/faculty/pages/gvigliocco/FV/html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We discuss two key assumptions of Levelt et al.'s model of lexical retrieval: (1) the nondecompositional character of concepts and(2) lemmas as purely syntactic representations. These assumptions fail to capture the broader role of lemmas, which we propose as that of lexical–semantic representations binding (compositional) semantics with phonology (or orthography).

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press