Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T01:58:11.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constructivism: Can directed mutation improve on classical neural selection?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1997

George N. Reeke
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Biological Modelling, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10021 reeke@lobimo.rockefeller.edu www.rockefeller.edu/labheads/reeke/reeke-frame.html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Quartz & Sejnowski (Q&S) find flaws in standard theories of neural selection, which they propose to repair by introducing Lamarckian mechanisms for anatomical refinement that are analogous to directed mutation in evolution. The reversal of cause and effect that these mechanisms require is no more plausible in an explanation of cognition than it is in an explanation of evolution.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press