Counterfactuality in counterintuitive religious concepts

Justin L. Barrett

doi:10.1017/S0140525X04230175

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In sketching a preliminary scientific theory of religion, Atran & Norenzayan (A&N) generally agree with cognitive scientists of religion in the factors that coalesce to form religion. At times they misrepresent, however, the notion of “counterintuitive” concepts as they apply to religious concepts, confusing counterintuitive with counterfactual, category mistakes, and logical contradiction.

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Shintani, Ryo Murakami, Masataka and Hayashi, Tamio 2008. γ-Methylidene-δ-valerolactones as a coupling partner for cycloaddition: Palladium-catalyzed [4+3] cycloaddition with nitrones. Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 80, Issue. 5, p. 1135.

Hornbeck, Ryan G and Barrett, Justin L 2008. Virtual reality as a spiritual experience: a perspective from the cognitive science of religion. Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 75.

PurzyckI, Benjamin Grant 2012. Toward a Cognitive Ecology of Religious Concepts. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 99.

Hornbeck, Ryan G. and Barrett, Justin L. 2013. Refining and Testing “Counterintuitiveness” in Virtual Reality: Cross-Cultural Evidence for Recall of Counterintuitive Representations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 15.

Wilkins, John S. 2015. Gods Above: Naturalizing Religion in Terms of our Shared Ape Social Dominance Behavior. Sophia, Vol. 54, Issue. 1, p. 77.

Purzycki, Benjamin Grant and Willard, Aiyana Koka 2016. Accounting for variation and stability in religious cognition. Religion, Brain & Behavior, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 266.

Fortier, Martin and Kim, Sunae 2017. The Science of Lay Theories. p. 265.

Nordin, Andreas and Bjälkebring, Pär 2019. Measuring Counterintuitiveness in Supernatural Agent Dream Imagery. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 10, Issue. ,

Beebe, James R. and Duffy, Leigh 2020. The Memorability of Supernatural Concepts: Effects of Minimal Counterintuitiveness, Moral Valence, and Existential Anxiety on Recall. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 322.

Sommer, Joseph Spencer, Chrystal Musolino, Julien and Hemmer, Pernille 2022. A new methodological tool for research on supernatural concepts. Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 55, Issue. 1, p. 220.

Ük, Bengi and Bahcekapili, Hasan G 2022. The relation of individual and collective narcissism and belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories: the moderating effects of need for uniqueness and belonging. Discover Psychology, Vol. 2, Issue. 1,

Sommer, Joseph Musolino, Julien and Hemmer, Pernille 2023. Counterintuitive Concepts Across Domains: A Unified Phenomenon?. Cognitive Science, Vol. 47, Issue. 4,

Stubbersfield, Joseph M. 2024. Encyclopedia of Religious Psychology and Behavior. p. 1.

Article contents

Counterfactuality in counterintuitive religious concepts

Abstract:

Information

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Article contents

Counterfactuality in counterintuitive religious concepts

Abstract:

Information

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests