Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T10:14:54.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differentiating robotic behavior and artificial intelligence from animal behavior and biological intelligence: Testing structural accuracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2002

Ralph R. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000 rmiller@binghamton.edu arcedian@binghamton.edu
Francisco Arcediano
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000 rmiller@binghamton.edu arcedian@binghamton.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We emphasize the feature of Webb's presentation that bears most directly on contemporary research with real animals. Many neuroscience modelers erroneously conclude that a model that performs like an animal must have achieved this goal through processes analogous with those used by the animal. A simulation failure justifies rejecting a model, but success does not justify acceptance. However, an important benefit of models, successful or otherwise, is to stimulate new research.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press