Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T22:30:12.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Digging beneath Rules and Similarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2005

Arthur B. Markman*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 http://www.psy.utexas.edu/psy/faculty/markman/index.html
Sergey Blok*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 http://www.psy.utexas.edu/psy/faculty/markman/index.html
Kyungil Kim*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 http://www.psy.utexas.edu/psy/faculty/markman/index.html
Levi Larkey*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 http://www.psy.utexas.edu/psy/faculty/markman/index.html
Lisa R. Narvaez*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 http://www.psy.utexas.edu/psy/faculty/markman/index.html
C. Hunt Stilwell*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 http://www.psy.utexas.edu/psy/faculty/markman/index.html
Eric Taylor*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712 http://www.psy.utexas.edu/psy/faculty/markman/index.html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Pothos suggests dispensing with the distinction between rules and similarity, without defining what is meant by either term. We agree that there are problems with the distinction between rules and similarity, but believe these will be solved only by exploring the representations and processes underlying cases purported to involve rules and similarity.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005