Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T18:06:49.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolutionary analyses should include pluralistic and falsifiable hypotheses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2003

Craig W. LaMunyon
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314 clamunyo@fau.edu
Todd K. Shackelford
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314 tshackel@fau.edu http://www.psy.fau.edu/tshackelford/
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Andrews et al. attempt to clarify the standards for determining whether traits are adaptations. The authors argue that tests of adaptationist hypotheses best proceed by assessing the consistency of the traits with the proposed standards. Critical tests of such standards must assess inconsistency – hypotheses must be falsifiable. To fully understand trait evolution, we must consider both adaptive and nonadaptive hypotheses.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press