Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T04:32:44.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experience and decisions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2003

Edmund Fantino  and
Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino
Edmund Fantino*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California–San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109
Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California–San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109
*
efantino@ucsd.edu
sfantino@psy.ucsd.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Game-theoretic rationality is not generally observed in human behavior. One important reason is that subjects do not perceive the tasks in the same way as the experimenters do. Moreover, the rich history of cooperation that participants bring into the laboratory affects the decisions they make.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003