Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T01:04:54.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feedback consistency effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2000

Johannes C. Ziegler
Affiliation:
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia LPC-CNRS, Aix-en-Provence, France ziegler@newsup.univ-mrs.fr
Guy C. Van Orden
Affiliation:
Cognitive Systems Group, Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104 guy.van.orden@asu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Models are not adequately evaluated simply by whether they capture the data, after the fact. Other criteria are needed. One criterion is parsimony; but utility and generality are at least as important. Even with respect to parsimony, however, the case against feedback is not as straightforward as Norris et al. present it. We use feedback consistency effects to illustrate these points.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press