Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T22:29:18.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flexible feature creation: Child's play?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1998

Gedeon Deák
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203 deakgo@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu peabody.vanderbilt.edu/psych_and_hd/faculty/deakg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Schyns, Goldstone & Thibaut's argument is evaluated from a developmental perspective. Theoretically, feature creation is not necessarily problematic; this view derives from the assumption of innate content (primitive feature sets). Alternative assumptions (e.g., Piaget's theory) are possible. Preschool children readily search for novel features in response to task demands. This is compatible with functionalist approaches, but not the rationalist ones criticized by the authors.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press