Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T06:06:28.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Functional resemblance and the internalization of rules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2002

Gerard O'Brien
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005 Australia gerard.obrien@adelaide.edu.au jon.opie@adelaide.edu.au http://www.arts.adelaide.edu.au/Philosophy/gobrien.html http://www.arts.adelaide.edu.au/Philosophy/jopie.html
Jon Opie
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005 Australia gerard.obrien@adelaide.edu.au jon.opie@adelaide.edu.au http://www.arts.adelaide.edu.au/Philosophy/gobrien.html http://www.arts.adelaide.edu.au/Philosophy/jopie.html
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Kubovy and Epstein distinguish between systems that follow rules, and those that merely instantiate them. They regard compliance with the principles of kinematic geometry in apparent motion as a case of instantiation. There is, however, some reason to believe that the human visual system internalizes the principles of kinematic geometry, even if it does not explicitly represent them. We offer functional resemblance as a criterion for internal representation. [Kubovy & Epstein]

Information

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press