Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T05:19:50.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further evidence for, and some against, a planning–control dissociation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2004

Paul van Donkelaar and
Paul R. Dassonville
Paul van Donkelaar*
Affiliation:
Department of Exercise and Movement Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97405-1240 www.uoregon.edu/~paulvd/lab/eye_research.html
Paul R. Dassonville*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97405-1240 psychweb.uoregon.edu/faculty/facultyinfo.htm#Dassonville
*
paulvd@darkwing.uoregon.edu
prd@darkwing.uoregon.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We summarize a number of recent results from our own experiments as well as those from other laboratories. Some of these results support Glover's planning/control dissociation and some are at odds with it. We suggest that the model needs to be further refined and expanded.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 2004, pp. 52 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004