Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T01:50:08.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further issues in summarizing 345 studies of interpersonal expectancy effects

Review products

OnRosenthalRobert, and RubinDonald B. (1978) Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studies. BBS 1:377–415.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Robert Rosenthal  and
Donald B. Rubin
Robert Rosenthal
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Social Relations, Harvard University, Cambridge. Mass., 02138; and Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J. 08540
Donald B. Rubin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Social Relations, Harvard University, Cambridge. Mass., 02138; and Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J. 08540
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Author's Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 1980 , pp. 475 - 476
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adair, J. G. (1978) The combined probabilities of 345 studies: only half the story? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:386–87. [GP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1952) Social psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall. [MJR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, T. X., and Silver, M. J. (1968) Fact, fiction, and the experimenter bias effect. Psychological Bulletin Monograph Supplement 70:1–29. [MJR]Google Scholar
Bartlett, J. (1968) Familiar quotations (14th ed.). Boston: Little, Brown. [CRS]Google Scholar
Biondo, J., and MacDonald, A. P. Jr. (1971) Internal-external locus of control and response to influence attempts. Journal of Personality 39:407–19. [AMC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clair, M. S., and Snyder, C. R. (1979) Effects of instructor-delivered sequential evaluative feedback upon students' subsequent classroom related performance and instructor ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology 71:50–57. [CRS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, A. M.; Michie, P. T.; Andreasen, A. G.; Viney, L. L.; and Rosenthal, R. (1976) Expectancy effects in a psychophysiological experiment. Physíological Psychology 4:137–44. [AMC]Google Scholar
Crano, W. D. & Mellon, P. M. (1978) Causal influence of teacher's expectations on children's academic performance: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 70:39–48. [ JMD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S., and Rosenthal, R. (1968) Vocal emphasis in experimenters' instructions as unintended determinant of subjects' responses. Language and Speech: Part I: 20–26. [MJR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S.; Rosenberg, M. J.; and Finkelstein, J. (1969) The paralanguage of experimenter bias. Sociometry 32:207–19. [MJR, RR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elashoff, J. D., and Snow, R. E. (1970) A case study in statistical inference: reconsideration of the Rosenthal-Jacobson data on teacher expectancy. Technical Report No. 15, Stanford Center for research and development in education. [MJR]Google Scholar
Ellsworth, P. C. (1978) When does an experimenter bias? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:392–93. [GP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson. [MJR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadlin, H. (1978) Great expectations… big disappointment. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:394. [GP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergen, K. J. (1973) Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 26(2):309–20. [MJR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, G. V. (1978) In defense of generalization. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:394–95. [GP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halperin, K., and Snyder, C. R. (1979) The effects of psychological test feedback on treatment outcome: therapeutic implications of the Barnum effect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 47:140–46. [CRS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, T. (1968) The experimenter bias effect: a failure to replicate. Psychonomic Science 13:239–40. [MJR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1948) Essays in pragmatism. New York: Mafner. [AMC]Google Scholar
Jones, E. E., and Nisbett, R. E. (1971) The actor and observer: divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In: Jones, E. E.; Kanouse, D. E.; Kelley, H. H.; Nisbett, R. E.; Valins, S.; and Weiner, B. (eds.) Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press. [CRS]Google Scholar
Kelly, G. A. (1969) Humanistic methodology in psychological research. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 9:53–65. [AMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lana, R. E. (1969) Pretest sensitization. In: Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R. L. (Eds.) Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press, pp. 119–41. [MJR]Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1963) Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67:371–78. [MJR]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milgram, S. (1965) Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations 18:57–76. [MJR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. G. (1972) The social psychology of psychological research. New York: The Free Press. [MJR]Google Scholar
Miller, A. G. (1978) And in this corner, from Cambridge, Massachusetts…. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:401–2. [GP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. T., and Ross, M. (1975) Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin 82:213–15. [CRS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minor, M. W. (1970) Experimenter-expectancy effect as a function of evolution apprehension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 15:326–32. [MJR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orne, M. T. (1962) On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist 17:776–83. [MJR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, G. (1971) The positive-negative asymmetry: on cognitive consistency and positivity bias. European Journal of Social Psychology 1:455–74. [GP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, R. C. (1970) Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review 40:411–51. [JMD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, A. (1961) The psychology of the scientist. Science 134:456–59. [AMC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, M. J. (1965) When dissonance fails: on eliminating evaluation apprehension from attitude measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1:28–42. [MJR]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, M. J. (1969) The conditions and consequences of evaluation apprehension. In: Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R. L. (Eds.) Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press, pp. 279–349. [MJR]Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. (1966) Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (MJR, JMD)Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. (1969) Interpersonal expectations: effects of the experimenter's hypothesis. In: Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. L. (eds.) Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press, pp. 181–277. [RR]Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. (1973) On the social psychology of self-fulfilling prophecy: further evidence for pygmalion effects and their mediating mechanisms. New York: MSS Modular Publication, Module, 53. [RR]Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. (1976) Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts (Rev. Ed.) New York:Irvington. [AMC, RR]Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. (1979) (Ed.) Skill in nonverbal communication: individual differences. Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain. [RR]Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. and Jacobson, L. (1968) Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rine-hart and Winston. [MJR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R. and Rubin, D. B. (1978a) Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studies. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:377–86. [Target Article]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R. and Rubin, D. B. (1978b) Issues in summarizing the first 345 studies of interpersonal expectancy effects. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:410–15. [Author's Response]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R. and Hall, J. A.; DiMatteo, M. R.; Rogers, P. L.; and Archer, D. (1979) Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: the PONS test. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. [RR]Google Scholar
Rotter, J. G. (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs 80: (Whole No. 609), 1–18. [AMC]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherif, M. A. (1936) The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper. [MJR]Google Scholar
Stewart, C. G. (1978) Progress toward the statistical and psychological significance of expectancy effects. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:406–8. [CP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, R. L. (1968) Review of “Pygmalion in the classroom.” American Educational Research Journal 5:708–11. [MJR]Google Scholar
Viney, L. L. (1978) Psychology is between people. Unpublished manuscript, Macquarie University, Australia. [AMC]Google Scholar
Viney, L. L. and Clarke, A. M. (1978) Effects of modelling and instruction on problem-solving by school-children with different expectations of success. Australian Journal of Education 22:179–88. [AMC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wason, P. C., and Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972) Psychology of reasoning. Structure and context. London: B. T. Batsford Ltd. [GP]Google Scholar
Weber, S. D., and Cook, T. D. (1972) Subject effects in laboratory research: on examination of subject roles, demand characteristics and valid inference. Psychological Bulletin 77:273–95. [MJR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, E. (1972) Apprehensive or cooperative: a study of human subject effects in psychological research. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago. [MJR]Google Scholar