Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T11:21:09.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

g and Darwinian algorithms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2001

Kevin MacDonald
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, California State University-Long Beach, Long Beach, CA 90840-0901 kmacd@csulb.edu csulb.edu~/~kmacd/
David Geary
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 gearyd@missouri.edu www.missouri.edu/~psycorie/
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Stanovich & West's assumption of discrete System 1 and System 2 mechanisms is questionable. System 2 can be understood as emerging from individuals who score high on several normally distributed cognitive mechanisms supporting System 1. Cognitions ascribed to System 1 and System 2 appear to be directed toward the same evolutionary significant goals, and thus are likely to have emerged from the same selection pressures.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press