Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T12:15:11.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gone with the wind: Individual differences in heuristics and biases undermine the implication of systematic irrationality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2001

David C. Funder
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521 funder@citrus.ucr.edu www.psych.ucr.edu/faculty/funder/RAP/RAP.htm
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The target article's finding of stable and general individual differences in solving of problems in heuristics-and-biases experiments is fundamentally subversive to the Meliorist research program's attention-getting claim that human thought is “systematically irrational.” Since some people get these problems right, studies of heuristics and biases may reduce to repeated demonstrations that difficult questions are hard to solve.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press