Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:19:27.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

If the base rate fallacy is a fallacy, does it matter how frequently it is committed?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1997

Jonathan E. Adler
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Brooklyn College and the Graduate Center, C.U.N.Y. Brooklyn, NY 11210 jeabc@cunyvm.cuny.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In many base rate studies, a judgment is required for which the base rates are relevant, and subjects do not use them. It is inferred that the base rates are ignored; I question this inference. Second, I argue that the base rate fallacy is not less significant for what it reveals about human reasoning, if it occurs less frequently than has been alleged.

Information

Type
Continuing Commentary
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press