Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:50:59.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Illuminating reasoning and categorization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2005

Evan Heit  and
Brett K. Hayes
Evan Heit*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom www.warwick.ac.uk/staff/E.Heit
Brett K. Hayes*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia www.psy.unsw.edu.au
*
E.Heit@warwick.ac.uk
b.hayes@unsw.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The proposal regarding rules and similarity is considered in terms of ability to provide insights regarding previous work on reasoning and categorization. For reasoning, the issue is the relation between this proposal and one-process as well as two-process accounts of deduction and induction. For categorization, the issue is how the proposal would simultaneously explain both similarity-to-rule and rule-to-similarity shifts.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005