Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-lpg2g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:19:33.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inclusive versus exclusive approachesto sleep and dream research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2001

Robert Stickgold
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 rstickgold@hms.harvard.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

By assuming that REM sleep either plays a critical role in all memory consolidation or no role in any, Vertes & Eastman have chosen to reject, rather than explain, robust experimental findings of a role for sleep in memory and learning. In contrast, Nielsen has attempted to integrate conflicting findings in the dispute over REM versus NREM mentation. Researchers must trust the data more and the theories less, and build integrative rather than exclusionary models if they hope to resolve these knotty problems effectively.

[Nielsen; Vertes & Eastman]

Information

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press