Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T22:54:54.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indirect representation of grammatical class at the lexeme level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

Michael H. Kelly
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6196 kelly@psych.upenn.edu www.sas.upenn.edu/~kellym
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Lexemes supposedly represent phonological but not grammatical information. Phonological word substitutions pose problems for this account because the target and error almost always come from the same grammatical class. This grammatical congruency effect can be explained within the Levelt et al. lexicon given that (1) lexemes are organized according to phonological similarity and (2) lexemes from the same grammatical category share phonological properties.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press