Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T04:53:22.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Individual differences: Variation by design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2001

Anthony J. Greene
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908 ajg3x@virginia.edu www.people.virginia.edu/~ajg3x
William B. Levy
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908 ajg3x@virginia.edu www.people.virginia.edu/~ajg3x
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Stanovich & West (S&W) appear to overlook the adaptivity of variation. Behavioral variability, both between and within individuals, is an absolute necessity for phylogenetic and ontological adaptation. As with all heritable characteristics, inter-individual behavioral variation is the foundation for natural selection. Similarly, intra-individual variation allows a broad exploration of potential solutions. Variation increases the likelihood that more optimal behaviors are available for selection. Four examples of the adaptivity of variation are discussed: (a) Genetic variation as it pertains to behavior and natural selection; (b) behavioral and cognitive aspects of mate selection which may facilitate genetic diversity; (c) variation as a strategy for optimizing learning through greater exploration; and (d) behavioral variation coupled with communication as a means to propagate individually discovered behavioral success.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press