Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T10:08:51.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The internalization of physical constraints from a developmental perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2002

Horst Krist
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland hkrist@genpsy.unizh.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Shepard's internalization concept is defended against Hecht's criticisms. By ignoring both Shepard's evolutionary perspective and the fact that internalization does not preclude modularization, Hecht advances inconclusive evidence. Developmental research supports Shepard's conclusion that kinematic geometry may be more deeply internalized than physical dynamics. This research also suggests that the internalization concept should be broadened to include representations acquired during ontogeny. [Hecht; Shepard]

Information

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press