Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T13:59:13.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Let's forget the everyday/laboratory controversy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Lia Kvavilashvili
Affiliation:
Division of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB;
Judi Ellis
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AL, United Kingdom, l.kvavilashvili@herts.ac.uk; sxseliju@reading.ac.uk

Abstract

In contrast to its aims, Koriat & Goldsmith's article vividly demonstrates(1) the complementarity of ecological and traditional approaches and (2) the difficulty of characterising the growing diversity of memory research with a single set of distinctions. Moreover, the contrast between correspondence and storehouse metaphors is important enough to stand alone without reference to an everyday/laboratory controversy, which is neither acute nor necessary.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable