Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T20:24:15.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The level of filling-in and when it is cognitive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1998

Richard L. Gregory
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TN United Kingdom richard.gregory@bris.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This informative and conceptually stimulating target article is very useful. I merely query whether the term “illusory contours” is appropriate for gap filling; “illusory surfaces” seems better – and “fictional surfaces” better still. These seem to be rule based rather than knowledge based, suggesting indeed the importance of distinguishing rules (analogous to syntax in language) from knowledge (equivalent to semantics) for classifying perceptual phenomena.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press